The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Damn Good to See Them

When it comes to retrospection in the moment, the 1986 Mets have become their own version of the 1969 Mets. That is to say, it’s damn good to see them after all these years. It may not produce the electrical charge it used to, but damn good is plenty good.

I attended, in the delightful and generous company of my dear friend Jeff Hysen, Saturday’s 40th-anniversary reunion of the 1986 world champions, the last Mets team (you might have noticed) to have won a World Series. I also attended Saturday reunions on the occasions of the 20th and 30th anniversaries, when 1986 was, respectively, a while ago, and a long while ago. Maybe because 2006 and 2016 were 10 and 20 years closer to 1986 than 2026 is — as well as far more contemporarily competitive — I could feel the Flushing air bristle with excitement at the sight of the not-so-old champs. We certainly wished in ’16 and ’06 that we hadn’t been left waiting for an encore, but until we got one, we had the ’86 Mets right here in front of us. The 1986 Mets were our beau ideal of baseball like it oughta be. They still are, I suppose, but their massive accomplishments are too distant to feel remotely present. Kind of like the 1969 Mets by the time we got to their 25th and 30th anniversaries.

The people who ran the Mets in the 1970s, even while running the 1970s Mets into the ground, never shied from the 1969 legacy. There was a 10th-anniversary Old Timers Day in their honor in 1979, as bottom of the barrel a season as the Mets have ever known. It was more than damn good to see the 1969 Mets 10 years later. As many of them who weren’t playing anymore showed up at Shea to remind us miracles were possible. In 1979, it was gonna take a miracle to get us thinking anything good could ever happen to this franchise. Little would have we guessed the greatest of all things was going to happen seven years hence.

The 1969 Mets came back as a unit in 1989, in 1994, in 1999, all after 1986, all after they were no longer the most recent world champion Mets. Just about every member of the team who had been let go unceremoniously (which was just about every member of the team) had returned to the organization’s good graces, and vice-versa. The business of baseball engenders understandable grudges. The romance of baseball erases them. When the ’69 Mets came back to be celebrated, they didn’t need to go through an emotional car wash to rid themselves of the grime of having been traded or released. They returned as the Mets they always were, the Mets they’d always be. And by doing so as blessedly frequently as they did, they became just familiar enough to not be exotic. The thrill of ohmigod, the 1969 Mets are here! in 1979 evolved by the 1990s to something more like oh, the 1969 Mets are here. It was damn good to see them. The electricity might have flickered.

Changes in stadia helped replug the ’69 Mets back into our central nervous system. It meant something that so many of them were on the field for the last day at Shea. It meant something more that so many of them gathered to be feted the next August at Citi. Citi Field felt barren and soulless for its four-plus months of existence. The 1969 Mets’ 40th-anniversary reunion consecrated the grounds. The facility was now a ballpark. When as many who could came back for the 50th anniversary in 2019, I daresay the atmosphere for their reunion bordered on electric. Those are the 1969 Mets! Right here! Ohmigod!

Perhaps it’s an adjustment for nostalgic inflation to glean that the 1986 Mets at 40 are approximately where the 1969 Mets were when they were 25 or 30. We who were coming of age as something approximating adults when the 1986 Mets were storming through the National League may have been reluctant to let go of our youth as readily as our predecessors. The 1986 Mets never didn’t seem at least sort of recent when they got together again. They weren’t invited to get together again for a 10th anniversary, either because too many were still busy playing or the people who were then running the Mets didn’t wish to acknowledge a team like the 1986 Mets once roamed our earth, so when the 20th anniversary came around, and the 1986 Mets came around to get properly toasted, our response in the stands veered between cathartic and orgasmic. Between 2006 and 2016, YouTube exploded, and we kept clicking on 1986 highlights. The recency barely budged when their 30th anniversary was celebrated, which was also the “ass in the jackpot” night Noah Syndergaard sought to send a delayed message to Chase Utley. The best message would have been “get the ’86 guys down from whatever luxury suite they’re congregating in, they’ll know what to do.” It had been only 30 years. Surely our champs were still in fighting trim.

On Saturday afternoon, the edge the arrival of the 1986 Mets brought to the event they headlined was limited to memory. Helluva memory, no doubt, but c’mon. It’s 40 years. They’re entitled to recede in relevancy. We know they were rascals and rapscallions in their day. We still love the seminal clips that compose the Proustian montages. We see them as avatars of another time. It wasn’t an Old Timers Day in name, but I feel qualified to say, as someone who is roughly the same age as quite a few of the 1986 Mets, a touch of gray kind of suits us, anyway.

Did I mention it was damn good to see them? All but one of the surviving World Series teammates were on hand. They all got a nice hand. They all deserved 116 nice hands, one for every game won from Opening Night in Pittsburgh to the final out versus Boston. They did something only one Mets team did before them, something no Mets team has done since them. The latter reality may have had something to do with the diminished edge attached to the sight of them. The 1986 Mets are golden now. They don’t gotta fight for their right to party. They won the fight and still hold the title. It’s damn good to know that. And it’s damn good to imagine a 50th-anniversary reunion when we will remember they won practically every game they played but have lost the title of most recent Mets champions.

The 2026 Mets aren’t going to do anything about that part. They were considerate enough to wear the racing stripe uniforms of 1986, a beautiful complement to the ceremonial aspects of Saturday, but they had a hard time fitting into them, and I don’t mean because of tapering issues. To say the 2026 Mets are not the 1986 Mets is not a knock, for no Mets team is the 1986 Mets. After 112 games, the 1986 Mets held a record of 75-37 and led the NL East by 18 games; with 50 games to go, their magic number was down to 33. But the 2026 Mets are not a whole lot of other Met teams when measured by record. After 112 games, the 2026 Mets are 47-65, leaving them in last place, 19½ games out of first, nowhere near any Wild Card. The only magic number the Mets were counting down Saturday, as they quietly went about losing to the Miami Marlins, was how many hours remained until the trade deadline. The 2026 Mets have the same record after 112 games as the 1977, 1978, 1979, and 2018 Mets. Fifty different Mets team posted better records after 112 games than the 2026 Mets have.

Think about the 2026 Mets too long, and you’ll find yourself unable to generate any warmth toward humankind. Think about the 1986 Mets instead. Try not to think about how long it’s been. Just remember what it was like if you can. If it doesn’t get you hot and bothered like it once did, I truly believe you’ll still feel warm all over.

My friend Jeff has had a couple of members of the 1986 Mets on his podcast, National League Town. Listen in on his conversations with Roger McDowell here, and Darryl Strawberry here.

Late March in July

The Mets held a Christmas in July promotion the other night, which apparently inspired a sequel of sorts on Friday when they conducted their business a little like it was the end of March. They had a starting pitcher slated to throw, but then decided they better not let that starting pitcher be seen, lest somebody get too good a look at him. That’s the thought process you hear about as Spring Training is coming to an end. You’re playing the Marlins in Jupiter or St. Lucie, but you know you’ve got the Marlins in the first series of the year, thus you don’t want to overly expose whoever’s lined up to face them for real in five days.

Friday night was something like that, except it was the end of July when such thoughts shouldn’t circle an organization’s head. And though the Mets were playing the Marlins for real, this had nothing to do with the Marlins. The Mets were concerned that somebody contemplating trading for Freddy Peralta would get too good a gander of Freddy Peralta and adjust their contemplation. Or, one supposes, they wanted to figuratively bubble-wrap Peralta, keeping him from harm’s way on his way out the door.

Too bad it didn’t occur to the Mets’ brain trust to deploy the Hide Peralta strategy shortly after breaking camp. A season in which Freddy Peralta had been kept from pitching for the Mets likely wouldn’t have been any less successful than the one in which he took the ball 22 times and gave up five earned runs every nine innings.

If this really were the final days of Spring Training, the Mets would have grabbed a minor leaguer from a back field to take Freddy’s Friday start. Instead, they checked that storage unit they maintain on College Point Blvd. to double-check that they had never gotten rid of Kodai Senga. Senga hadn’t pitched in about two weeks. For a team that’s made a habit of shuttling fresh and used arms back and forth from the minors, ever conscious of overuse, it’s quite a feat for a presumably healthy pitcher to go completely unused for a discernible stretch of time. An unsightly ERA might have had something to do with it, but it’s not like giving up runs discouraged the Mets from repeatedly using Peralta.

So Senga was the self-inflicted emergency starter Friday night and he was, for four innings, the best version of himself, certainly a damn sight better than any version of the Freddy Peralta Mets Experience. Only one Miami baserunner, no Miami runs, impeccable efficiency. The Mets weren’t doing anything on offense versus Janson Junk, but that was OK. Who pays attention to the score when you’re just trying to get through these meaningless games ahead of Opening Day?

Oh, that’s right. This was July 31. The season’s been going on since March 26. Yet it was hard to remember that for the Mets this counted as much as any regular-season game counted. Because it’s July 31 and the trade deadline is August 3, everything about this team that exited contention prior to April 30 is provisional. We kind of know who’s going to be traded, but except for A.J. Minter, they haven’t been traded yet. Shouldn’t use Peralta. Probably done using Brooks Raley. Luke Weaver is in limbo. Tyrone Taylor was hot for a few days, so he’ll be gone, maybe. Luis Robert, if he stays in one piece, might be a piece that gets moved. Really, there’s more roster certainty in St. Lucie in the final days of camp most Marches.

Senga got hit a bit in the fifth, and the luck that had been pressed evaporated. Xzavion Curry came on and didn’t budge, going five innings to finish out the 5-2 defeat accompli. Good for Xzavier Curry, who wasn’t a Met when the day began. He, along with the sticky Jonathan Pintaro, replaced Minter and the injured Cionel Perez in the bullpen. Pintaro is intermittently sent down but never seems to be gone. Perez was the bullpen’s answer to Jared Young for a couple of months, climbing from “hey, who’s that?” to “say, he’s not bad.” Sadly, Perez suffered a left forearm strain. Whatever plans the Mets had for him — higher-leverage innings or everybody-must-go inventory — had to be shelved.

Conceptually, the 2026 Mets fancied themselves buyers by the end of July. That was toward the end of March, when they had no idea they wouldn’t be one or two clever deadline deals from shaping a playoff-ready roster. The end of July has become the beginning of August. There will almost certainly be new players here soon. The story will remain the same. The Mets might win a game. The Mets might lose a game. The result will show up in the standings. There are Grapefruit League standings, too, but it rarely occurs to a sane person to look at them.

Oh Sure Now They're Watchable

I shouldn’t be surprised, given how baseball is riddled with ironies, and yet I am: A team about to undergo a trade-deadline sea change is playing its best ball of the season.

(The transformation is already underway, as the Mets have traded A.J. Minter to the Twins for a pair of prospects: Bruin Agbayani, the 19-year-old son of fan favorite Benny Agbayani; and Billy Amick, a Double-A third baseman with power but contact issues. My reaction will likely be the same that greets every departure save that of Luke Weaver: OK, fine, ask me my opinion in a couple of years.)

Anyway, the Mets squared off with the Marlins for a rain-delayed Thursday night game that turned out to be pretty fun, principally though not exclusively because they won — beating the loathsome, nihilistic Marlins is always worth an extra fist pump.

This one started as a nifty duel between Nolan McLean and Eury Perez: McLean made a pair of bad pitches that went for solo homers, while Perez had one bad inning, with his defense bearing a lot of the blame. It was fun to watch, but ended in a stalemate, an extended table-setter for what was to come with both starters having departed and the outcome to be determined by the bullpens.

In the eighth the Mets broke through with the kind of heartening inning we’ve seen … checks notes … basically never in 2026. Francisco Lindor had a long, grind-it-out AB against Miami’s Michael Petersen that looked like nothing more than a moral victory, as it ended in a pop-up and left the Mets with two out and nobody on. But it cost Petersen bullets he’d need; Bo Bichette then doubled and Carson Benge — who’d failed earlier in the game to bring home a gimme run from third — dug in for a long AB of his own, this one ending in a single. Benge stole second and Luis Robert Jr. snuck a ground ball through the 5.5 hole for two runs and, it would turn out, a Mets’ win. The win went to possibly soon to be no longer with us Brooks Raley, a W that was well deserved; the save went to we’re probably stuck with him Devin Williams, whom my flickering sense of fairness compels me to admit pitched just fine.

During this recent stretch the Mets have been watchable and even fun, their run keyed by solid starting pitching. That likely ends tonight with Freddy Peralta making what one can only hope is his last start in a Met uniform, a departure I will decidedly not mourn. You know it’s gone badly when fans like me make a mental note to attend a departed Met’s return and risk soft-tissue injuries by booing the shit out of them; I don’t know when that date will be, but rest assured it will be on my calendar.

But I can endure one more evening of Peralta-related dyspepsia so long as it’s the last one, and genuinely will look forward to Zac Thornton and Christian Scott and more McLean and maybe more Sean Manaea and Clay Holmes, or perhaps those last two will be replaced by younger arms deemed deserving of a first chance or a latest one, which would also be fine. The calendar will have turned unofficially but decisively to 2027, and if the Mets look more like the Mets of the last week than the Mets of the preceding 57 or so, I’ll make my peace with that.

Whoever They’ll Be They’ll Be

When the Mets edged the Braves in the afternoon portion of Wednesday’s day-night “doubleheader” at Citi Field (if they scan for tickets twice, then it’s really just two wholly separate games played on the same day), it was both satisfying and mystifying. The satisfaction came mainly from the Mets having extended a winning streak to three games for the first time since they won four in a row to close out May. Lest we forget, the middle win of this aberrational trio was attained by a score of 14-3, registered not four weeks after the Mets had lost in Atlanta by the very same score of 14-3. The 14-3 loss on the Fourth of July represented only the fourth time the Mets had ever lost by that exact score. And the 14-3 win on July 27 represented only the fourth time the Mets had ever won by that exact score. Same Met team. Same Brave team. Same month. I’m still satisfied from having sussed out this discovery.

The mystery angle of Wednesday afternoon sat a bit inside the realm of “how did they do that?” — going 2-for-12 with runners in scoring position and leaving nine men on base doesn’t seem like a recipe for success — but mostly revolved around not knowing what to make of this 3-2 victory besides understanding it was a product of solid pitching, a modicum of timely hitting, and whatever was ailing Atlanta.

The Manaeassaince continued in earnest, with lovable ol’ Sean going six two-run innings and reasserting himself as a legitimate major league starter. Good news for us, unless this makes him trade bait. Then we go from “Sean is back!” to “who’d we get back for Sean?” Similarly, the frontline of the righthanded relief corps each contributing a scoreless frame was straight from the diagram of bullpen like it oughta be, except because it was July 29, and the trade deadline is August 3, and the 2026 Mets are the 2026 Mets, does that mean Huascar Brazobán goes? How about Luke Weaver? All one sees when a new pitcher comes into a game this week is how much (or how little) David Stearns will get in exchange for a functioning arm ideal circumstances would keep in Queens. Devin Williams and his contract don’t get mentioned much in this context, thus he appears ensconced to be issued the Mets’ weekly save opportunity.

The Met runs were driven in by three fellas under the age of 25, which is what we who have absented ourselves from the leaguewide pursuit of a playoff spot are supposed to be living for this time of year in a year like this. Play the kids, and get more kids. One of those who delivered an RBI was Francisco Alvarez, an elder in the Mets’ nascent youth movement. Somewhere along the way, the now 24-year-old Francisco crossed that line from young player with a potentially promising future to young player with a relentlessly frustrating present. His good couple of days at the plate could be taken for progress. Or a sign to move him while he’s hot. A.J. Ewing and Carson Benge can get hits and make catches (the more splendiferous the better) to their and our hearts’ delight. They’re not going anywhere at this deadline. Neither are we. The first game of the two-admission twinbill ended the season’s first half, with the Mets ascending to a record of 46-62. Doing the math to extrapolate their 162-game pace therein will only do a disservice to your well-being.

One can still be a happy with a 3-2 win in the afternoon, especially over the Braves. How happy is a question best left to instinct.

The nighttime portion Wednesday, compelled by rain Tuesday, was already a victory of sorts in that it inconvenienced Atlanta. The Braves generally don’t give their visitors a break by scheduling Getaway Day day games. The Mets had been courteous in making Wednesday’s planned series finale a matinee, a courtesy not extended them whenever they’re finishing up at Truist Park. Because of weather, the Braves wouldn’t be flying into Atlanta until pretty late Wednesday night/Thursday morning, likely making them a touch more tired than they thought they’d be today. HA!!

That’s about as “of sorts” as a victory can be, but we were entering the final third of a season on pace for 69 wins. We’ll take our victories, even the spiteful ones, thank you very much. Our pace, incidentally, isn’t carved into a predestined path. If we pick up the pace a tad, as out-of-it Met teams have been known to do — whether it’s from dealing the veterans, playing the kids, or luck balancing out — we might win a few more. I don’t want to say this too loud, lest some algorithm decide I need to see more gambling come-ons, but I wouldn’t bet against the Mets breaking the 70-win barrier before this dreary business concludes. It would probably require more three-game winning streaks occurring with greater frequency than every two months, but the Mets, identity of the components constituting them to be fully determined once the deadline passes, are bound to improve marginally after two-thirds of a season spent being not very good. I hesitate to say things can’t get worse than they’ve been (recent robust three-game winning streak notwithstanding), because that resides in the department of daring the Mets to do their worst. That can always happen around here.

The Mets didn’t necessarily do their worst on Wednesday night. They just didn’t do much versus Chris Sale, who they at least nicked for a few markers during that 14-3 loss on July 4. They’re hardly the first team about whom little can be said regarding their offensive effort when facing one of the most stifling lefties of his era. I’m sure they tried to hit him this time around. They didn’t much succeed. Benge singled. Eric Wagaman, who has assumed Juan Soto’s roster spot to zero fanfare and even less playing time, also singled. Those singles were a couple of innings apart. Not much in the way of rallying. Christian Scott was his own version of effective. Our youthful righty didn’t smother Brave bats as thoroughly as southpaw Sale did for the opposition, but it was heartening to watch him work. Christian posted zeros for five innings, then gave up only one run in a tough sixth, leaving the bases loaded in the process. Most nights — and during the day Wednesday — that would be enough to put a pitcher in line for a win.

At the risk of letting a fan’s imagination run modestly wild, Manaea (if he remains a Met) and Scott combining with Nolan McLean and h-less Zac Thornton doing what they’ve been doing lately has put me in mind of Earl Weaver’s famous formula for winning: get pitching and get three-run homers. We may have the former. We’ve gotta work on putting together more of the latter.

For the Mets on Wednesday night, it was pitching and no-run homers, no runs at all, a 1-0 defeat that was primarily Sale (6 IP), along with some dispiriting flailing at the Braves bullpen. Our night shift relievers were pretty good themselves. A.J. Minter gave the scouts a solid inning. Cionel Perez and Daniel Duarte may be putting themselves on some GM’s radar. Trade deadlines can make a lot of penmen popular.

A sweep of this so-called doubleheader might have left me awash in more mystification. How thrilled should I be now that we’ve climbed to…how far below .500 are we, again? Instead, I encountered only the familiar sensation of a Met loss, albeit with the wrinkle that it took place in a lost season’s final third. Fifty-three more games with these Mets, whoever these Mets will be by the fifty-third of them.

A Brief Cessation of Terrible Things

Zac Thornton and a band of relievers were good. The Mets’ bats were better — 19 hits, including three each from A.J. Ewing, Francisco Lindor, Bo Bichette, Marcus Semien and Tyrone Taylor. Lindor had two home runs on a huge night, Semien smashed one into the second deck, and Taylor hit a longball as he continued his absurd hot streak — which is also a beacon begging someone to helicopter him off the Mets’ roof before the trade deadline.

When five guys in the lineup collect three hits each, you’re probably going to win. (Francisco Alvarez Estrada, not exactly known for his patience, even walked three times!) It helped that the Braves looked weary and ragged, playing the kind of defense we’re more used to seeing from the Mets. With the game creeping out of reach and Atlanta’s bullpen exhausted by previous nights’ efforts, Walt Weiss left poor Connor Thomas out there to absorb a fearful beating: 11 earned runs in two and two thirds. It was tactically smart but cringingly cruel, a Seelingeresque stomping that left Thomas with an ERA for the year of 21.32 — old enough to drink, and a grim bookend for the 20.25 ERA that he posted last year as a Brewer.

Thomas will now undoubtedly become a Gwinnett Striper, while his teammates turn to a rested relief corps bolstered by whatever new arm is rotated in to be abused. That’s cruel too. But I don’t feel too bad for the Braves — first of all, because they’re the Braves, and second of all because they’re headed for October while the Mets are headed for the knacker’s yard.

One night in which hits felt as common as the raindrops isn’t going to reverse those fortunes. But damned if it didn’t feel good to be a peasant feasting in the royal banquet hall for one night. Eat, drink and be merry — for tomorrow, most likely, we go back to being the Mets.

Self-Esteem Sunday

Contrary to popular perception, the Los Angeles Dodgers do not merely have to throw their gloves on the field in order to defeat the New York Mets. Friday and Saturday, I’m pretty sure all it took was the Dodgers checking in on the MLB Ballpark app. From all appearances, L.A. clicked “win” prior to first pitch and confirmed their result in advance. The Dodgers truly looked like a team looking at their phones while playing a three-game series that didn’t seem worthy of their bother. They’d take an extra base if they didn’t have to slide. They’d score an extra run as long as the plate was left vacated. They’d stick out their bats on the assumption a baseball would meet it and produce satisfactory contact. They’d wait for the Mets to inevitably err.

On Sunday, the disinterested Dodger approach did not yield them a victory, proving…well, little beyond teams going nowhere occasionally outdo over the course of nine innings teams going to the airport. The Dodgers’ ultimate destination is their fourteenth consecutive postseason. They won this series. They won the two series that preceded it on their Northeast Corridor road trip. They also won the last World Series, the one before it, and all the playoff series required to reach the past two championship rounds. They are in first place by a dozen games. An 8-3 loss to the Mets hardly precluded the likelihood of a happy flight home. Until they’re overly weighed down by the massive expectations they pack every year, I imagine all the Dodgers’ flights are reasonably happy.

Yet for a few innings on Sunday, Mets fans’ spirits could soar. Tyrone Taylor hit a three-run homer to transform a 3-1 deficit into a 4-3 lead. Taylor’s swat in the sixth held up as heroic enough to rate an attempted ice bath while Steve Gelbs interviewed him postgame. It should surprise no one that the designated cooler dumpers, Francisco Alvarez and Juan Soto, missed their target, but did get the grass nice and wet. Marcus Semien also added a three-run homer in the seventh to assure us the scoreboard wasn’t an optical illusion.

Once late-period Freddy Peralta was done slogging through four pitch-laden innings yet giving up only three runs (the analytical interpretation of his line was “could have been worse”), the Met bullpen did its yeoman best. Cionel Perez, midseason’s answer to Austin Warren, shut down L.A. for two innings. One would think Cionel’s too low-profile to attract trade-deadline interest, but Perez has emerged as one of those Met relievers who doesn’t strike fear into the hearts of those rooting for him. Brooks Raley followed with a seven-pitch seventh. We intuit he’ll be gone by next week. Luke Weaver pitched into and fielded out of a spot of trouble. I’ll be sorry to see him leave if he does. By the time Devin Williams came on to close, the ninth wasn’t a save situation and Dave Roberts was pinch-hitting for Shohei Ohtani and Freddie Freeman, less waving a white flag than dabbing his forehead with an apathetic handkerchief.

For self-esteem purposes, this was a big Met win. No last-place team, no matter how miserably their year is going, should have to endure an ohfer in a season series versus a league behemoth. The Mets had played and lost to the Dodgers five times in 2026 prior to Sunday. One final shot at the champs yielded pay dirt. Or wet dirt, pending on how many ice cubes from that cooler piled where. Wet dirt is generally known as mud, which is where the Mets have been stuck since before their trip to Los Angeles in April. That was when we fretted all those West Coast swings were going to be the death of us. Maybe they were, but based on the way our team has played in and closer to Queens since, it’s safe to say geography wasn’t our primary problem.

We received another self-esteem boost if we chose to accept it on Sunday when Carlos Beltran declared his allegiance to the orange and blue in Cooperstown. Beltran’s plaque now hangs in the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, where his likeness is adorned by a Mets cap. That makes us 3-for-18 in terms of players in the Hall — and 0-for-2 among those inducted as managers — regarding what they’re wearing while bronzed. Tom Seaver’s Mets cap was an obvious historical and sartorial choice. Mike Piazza’s hat selection felt accompanied by billows of righteous white smoke, having risen in those halcyon days of not automatically assuming the Dodgers were going to get the best of us every time we saw them. When Beltran and the Hall let it be known over the winter that he and they thought the curly NY was appropriate for eternity, I was mildly surprised. Statistically, it wasn’t wrong. Spiritually, it was a coin flip, less between the Mets and Beltran’s first team the Royals than any of his seven teams and going sans insignia. Carlos was a modern ballplayer, elevated by free agency and agency in general. He went where he wanted to go. In the end, he wanted to go into immortality as a Met.

“To the Mets fans,” Beltran said as part of his induction speech, “thank you for believing in me. You challenged me. You let me know when I needed to be better, and that was a lot of times. I got to hear those boos, let me tell you that. But I also appreciate your support along the way.” Clearly, the superstar who became the finest all-around center fielder we ever experienced, heard and processed his share of cheers at Shea and Citi. A player of Beltran’s caliber choosing us in 2005 was a rocket ship for our self-esteem. It surely helped turn our team into a contender and division champion. Though he’s done earning Gold Gloves and Silver Sluggers in our garb, I believe the decision to be a Met on his plaque says something meaningful (beyond cementing his current role as a front office advisor). We remember who plays for us. It’s nice to be reminded that those played for us remember who cheered for them.

Sixty Hall of Famers, including the three newest, were on stage at Cooperstown on Sunday. Eight have “New York, N.L.” on their plaques if not on their heads. Jeff Kent joined Beltran (and Andruw Jones) as an inductee. Kent is portrayed as a San Francisco Giant, and fairly so. It was as a Giant, two teams after his Mets days, that his offense detonated, allowing him to pave a Hall of Fame path. Yet Jeff did take a moment to remember where his career gained a modicum of early traction. “New York was somethin’ that I was not prepared for,” our mid-’90s beacon of hope admitted. “You learn about pressure and accountability and responsibility fast in that city, and if you don’t, it’ll chew you up. But I am, without a doubt, grateful for every minute of it.” Kent also acknowledged the influence of long-ago Met lockermate, fellow Hall of Famer and ceremony attendee Eddie Murray (let’s say Murray sat stoic with pride while being shouted out), and his manager from 1993 to 1996, Dallas Green, who Jeff said accepted “no excuses for failure” despite the rampant epidemic of failure that beset Flushing during their shared era.

Few are those who enter the Hall of Fame in the 21st century without a word for multiple home teams. “Every organization shaped your career,” Beltran told the crowd spread out on the grounds of the Clark Sports Center. “New York shaped my life.” It was as a Met, Carlos continued, that “I experienced my greatest success and some of my greatest challenges. Playing for the Mets made me a better man […] The Mets cap represents for me growth and a place where I became the best version of myself.” Give or take a year like 2026, who among us wouldn’t attest to something like that?

Staring Out the Window and Waiting for Winter

A lesser-known quote from the great Rogers Hornsby has been on my mind recently: “People ask me what I do in summer when there’s baseball like this. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for winter.”

Today is Greg’s recap, I plan to be on the East River in a kayak during the matinee, and all of us are better off.

Well, maybe my poor blog partner won’t be better off (sorry Greg), but the Mets will get less bile spewed in their direction on Bluesky, you won’t have to roll your eyes at my moaning and complaining, and then there’s the fact that I would rather perform emergency eye surgery on myself with a spoon than watch David Stearns’ prized offseason acquisition Freddy Peralta try to avert a Dodgers sweep.

(Baseball being infinitely perverse, Peralta will now probably spin a no-hitter. Great! It’ll boost his trade value!)

I was definitely not better off Saturday night, when the Mets inflicted another tooth-grinding loss on what’s left of their fanbase. Everything went to pieces in the third inning: a bolt of a Kyle Tucker home run off the foul pole adjoining Carbonation Ridge, a double play turned into nothing when not-a-first-baseman Brett Baty‘s throw glanced off Dalton Rushing‘s helmet, a fielder’s choice that wasn’t a double play because Nolan McLean couldn’t find the first-base bag on the back end, and a passed ball by Francisco Alvarez to let in another run. The Dodgers are hard to beat without spotting them extra outs; the Mets gave them three freebies to make hay with, and they set to work with pitchforks flashing.

The Mets fought back, more annoyingly than successfully. In the eighth, down 4-1, they put the first two on in front of Jorge Polanco and Marcus Semien, those mighty twin pillars of Stearns’ 2026 vision. Both struck out haplessly, with Polanco underlining his incompetence by using up the Mets’ last ABS challenge on a strike that was, in fact, a strike.

The Mets drew within one on a pinch-hit double from Tyrone Taylor (who, to be fair, was also added by Stearns), and sent Francisco Lindor, Bo Bichette and Carson Benge to the plate in the bottom of the ninth against Brock Stewart. Bloop and a blast? Ha ha ha, oh you sweet summer child. Lindor struck out on a high fastball, Bichette grounded out, and Benge — who we should remember is still just a rookie despite a positive first season — was eviscerated on three straight strikes to end the game.

Sigh. The trade deadline can’t get here soon enough — to say nothing of the last pitch of this miserable season.

One Battle After Another

Here’s a free preview of the 2026 Holy Books roundup: It wasn’t Carson Benge‘s fault.

On Friday night Benge made not one but two sparking plays against the Dodgers, first nailing Shohei Ohtani at third when the best player in the history of the game tried to turn a one-handed excuse-me double into a triple, and then starting a perfect relay that erased Freddie Freeman at home.

Two outfield assists, the second setting a mild, very modern-era record of sorts: Benge’s throw came in at 100 MPH, the speediest tracked OF assist by a Met in the 11 years of Statcast. That’s a stat that struck me as equal parts pointless and entertaining; if you’re curious, it broke the record set about two weeks ago by Carson Benge.

So Benge contributed some nifty outfield play. That was good! Meanwhile, Sean Manaea pitched about as well as he has all year, leaning on his fastball and working aggressively, with welcome conviction behind everything he threw. That was also good!

But the Mets won a couple of battles — or at least tied them — while losing the war.

Not all of their shortcomings came with reasons for finger-wagging. The chief problem was that Roki Sasaki was really, really good, wiping out Met after Met with a splitter that was frankly dazzling. Veterans or rookies, capable hitters or somewhat suspect ones … it didn’t matter. They knew what was coming but the splitter was still untouchable.

Sasaki was really good — and so are the Dodgers. They kept coming at the Mets, as teams that know their business do, putting the leadoff hitter on base in seven out of nine innings. Baserunning misadventures? So what: They figured things would eventually break their way, and they did. In the seventh, Brooks Raley allowed a pair of gently struck singles to start the frame, then conspired with Francisco Alvarez on a sloppy rundown, getting Kyle Tucker at home but allowing Tucker’s teammates to wind up on second and third instead of first and second, which paved the way for a game-tying sacrifice fly from Ohtani. The Mets were still in the game, but an inning later A.J. Minter left a four-seamer middle-middle to Tucker, who crushed it for a fatal two-run homer.

Oh, and Juan Soto‘s calf flared up on him, so he exited in favor of beloved David Stearns import Jorge Polanco. Fantastic.

Good performances outshone by somewhat better ones, one team doing the little things better than the other team. Not the kind of thing that has managers overturning buffets or throwing bats into the showers to scare ’em (not that managers do either anymore), but enough for another humdrum loss in a season that’s filling up with them.

Still Twelve Shy

Someday, the Mets will do that thing you want them to do. They’ll figure out a place for Brett Baty, whether on the field or in another town. They’ll let a pitcher go as deep as his arm will allow him. They’ll hit a ball past a Brewer with runners on base. They’ll take less than three hours to slog to a 4-3 loss. They’ll loom as savvy buyers rather than put-upon sellers as a trade deadline approaches.

Wednesday was not the Opposite Day you might have sought. Baty was directed to a position that wasn’t in his Top Two, right field, and made the critical misplay that turned the getaway day matinee irreversibly against them. However many extra pitches his failure to make a difficult but makable grab cost Christian Scott ushered the righty off the mound before four innings were complete. The Mets bullpen, currently doubling as a trendy pop-up shop for MLB contenders, didn’t do badly after the starter departed, but the Mets were too busy finding a way to not win for it to matter. The Brewers are a first-place team. The Mets are a last-place team. The Mets played as well as they could have for considerable stretches, yet they were doomed to not get the big hit or make the key catch, whereas the Brewers were destined to do enough of what they had to do to prevail. Doom versus Destiny. It’s one of those seasons. Losing only two of three at the facility formerly known as Miller Park is the July 2026 equivalent of one of those series wins the rationalizing set usually trumpets as a tangible victory. They came so close to a four-and-two road trip!

Someday, the Mets will win twelve games in a row. That’s the thing I want them to do. Win another World Series, too, but that’s on everybody’s to-do list. I’ve seen them win two World Series. I’ve never seen them win twelve in a row. Five times in their history — 1969, 1972, 1986, 1990, and 2015 — they’ve won eleven in a row. Eleven in a row has been the Mets’ winning streak record for the life of my fandom. It’s one of the first things I knew about the Mets, and it is therefore one of the oldest things I know about the Mets. I found myself thinking, in the weeks leading up to this season, “I’d love for the Mets to win twelve in a row in 2026.”

An incredibly tough act to follow.

A couple of weeks after the 2026 season had started, the Mets had lost twelve in a row, which was not a record, but that’s OK, I wasn’t looking for a record in the opposite direction. They had won four in a row right before losing twelve in a row, and they later won four in a row once more. Their two longest winning streaks of 2026 have combined to equal a third of their longest losing streak of the year, the most games they had lost in a row in 24 years.

All of this came to mind as the 2026 Red Sox ran their winning streak to 15 consecutive games, which tied their franchise high from 1946. You may recall the Mets were the opponents in Boston’s seventh, eighth, and ninth wins in a row, proving it takes a little luck to fire off a monumental streak of this nature. The Red Sox’ luck was finding the Mets on their schedule right in the middle of it. The Sox couldn’t break their record, falling to the Orioles in the night half of their doubleheader Wednesday, meaning any fan of theirs who had been thinking as I was thinking before the season (“I’d sure like to see that 80-year-old standard of ours surpassed at last”) did not come away fully sated. Still, 15 in a row was pretty effective. The Red Sox rode it from the edge of oblivion to grasping a playoff spot. They don’t figure to be selling off players as we will be over the next eleven days.

I still wish for the Mets to someday win a dozen consecutive games, to top their most sustained hot rolls of dice from 57, 54, 40, 36, and 11 years ago. Should the Mets suddenly grow scalding, I won’t throw myself in their path to slow their roll, but I don’t know that I’d appreciate an unforeseen twelve-game winning streak in the back half of 2026 the way I might when it could do the Mets some genuine good. Let’s say the Mets win twelve in a row starting Friday against the Dodgers. Such a skein, as the papers used to call it, would lift them from their current mark of 43-60 to 55-60. They’d likely still be out of the Wild Card stakes, albeit quite a bit closer than they sit now. For this unforeseen uprising to create the kind of impact a lengthy surge oughta, the last-place Mets would need to follow these hypothetical twelve in a row with several more sizzling streaks, skeins, and spurts. Like a sweep of the three upcoming games versus the Dodgers, I’d welcome such momentum, but I wouldn’t expect it. Had somebody else’s winning streak not become a story, it wouldn’t occur to me to even think of asking for one of ours right now. It’s one thing to order a win à la carte. It’s another to request a dozen of them prepared to your liking ASAP.

I’m asking for twelve wins in a row someday. If I can be choosy about it, I’m asking for them in a season or the juncture of a season when they won’t spur me to ask, “Where were these when we could have used them?” I distinctly remember a seven-game winning streak in the latter half of August 1992. The Mets had already fallen on their faces and out of the pennant race. Then they won those seven in a row, and I found myself annoyed at the timing. The seven consecutive victories lifted them from fourteen under to seven under, from fifteen out to twelve-and-a-half-out. Save it for when we can use it, Mets. By the next time we could use it, we’d have mostly all new Mets. The next time the Mets won as many seven in a row was six years later. The Mets won nine in a row right after acquiring Mike Piazza in May of 1998. It got us into Wild Card position, a status that didn’t exist in August of 1992. That winning streak, like the non-coincidental presence of Mike Piazza, really came in handy in the context of its season. A mammoth winning streak now will just insert additional data points into any calculus our president of baseball operations is quantifying as the trade deadline approaches. That’s a guy who already acts as if he knows all the answers.

So while I will not be rooting for the Mets to not win their next twelve games in a row, and while I suspect I would heartily applaud the breaking of a positive franchise record, I’m putting my desire for a Mets twelve-game winning streak on the proverbial back burner. Or I would if, in fact, a twelve-game winning streak was just sitting around the kitchen waiting to be heated up. The waiter has just come to my table to advise me a Mets twelve-game winning streak is not on the menu, and special-ordering it now will be impossible.

The Ol' Switcheroo

Remember the long-ago ad in which they switched a fancy restaurant’s presumably fancy coffee for Folgers crystals? A similar experiment seemed to have happened in Milwaukee Tuesday night.

That was platinum glover Brice Turang looking oddly lethargic on a Carson Benge grounder that wound up bringing in two critical runs, and that was the Milwaukee infield doing ill-advised things with balls entrusted to it. (Pat Murphy‘s look of disgust in the Milwaukee dugout brought me back to the gape-mouthed stare Dallas Green sported too many days at Shea.) Meanwhile, that was Bo Bichette making beautiful plays at third and A.J. Ewing manning left field like he’d been there his whole life instead of making his maiden voyage.

But then it was a game of switcheroos, with Brandon Sproat starting against the club that sent him away in the now-infamous Freddy Peralta deal and Devin Williams returning to the site of his greatest success — and, if we’re being less charitable (as I generally am where Williams is concerned), the place where his career arrived at a fateful before-and-after moment.

Sproat looked pretty good, all told, working into the fifth and allowing two runs. But he also looked inefficient, with four walks ensuring his early departure. Sounds a little like Peralta, minus the snarling and snapping from your chronicler — and oh what I wouldn’t do for another switcheroo that involved those two changing places once again.

On the other side of the ball, Zac Thornton was terrific once again — and this time his teammates didn’t blow it, ensuring his first win. (Baseball Reference, like most places, seems not to have adopted the three-letter version of his name quite yet, so you’ll find our Zac here.) Thornton has unprepossessing stuff, but he fills up the strike zone and he’s aggressive, pitching with a sense of conviction that too often feels absent elsewhere on the Mets’ pitching staff. I’ll be curious if Thornton can keep it up once the league gets wise to his approach; for now, though, he’s a welcome sight in a rotation that feels like Russian roulette for the stubbornly innumerate.

And the Mets actually hit behind him! Jared Young grabbed the early lead with a second-inning homer, Francisco Lindor had three knocks, and Luis Robert Jr. mashed a ball that menaced a satellite or two, turning mouths in the Mets dugout into a comical line of amazed Os.

When Juan Soto is impressed by something you did at the plate, add it to your personal highlight reel.