The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 27 April 2023 10:17 am
When the Mets returned to what we’ll loosely call action Tuesday night, they were the inverse of what Annie Savoy saw in her Durham Bulls one extraordinary June and July where they’d played with joy and verve and poetry. That will happen after a cross-country flight that follows a West Coast road trip, we were informed, as if everybody had been handed talking points in advance of the Nationals series. The Mets ceased being gangbusters late in their swing through California, losing their last two in San Francisco to take the edge off what had been a 7-1 tear at the expense of opponents both downscale and upmarket. Shea la vie, we might have told ourselves. Seven wins versus three losses is still a pretty good ratio, and one can convince oneself to shake off a sub-so-so performance if jet lag becomes Met lag.
Wednesday night at Citi Field didn’t put me in mind of Bull Durham. It put me in mind of Moneyball, specifically the scene in which Billy Beane is trading Carlos Peña and Jeremy Giambi to keep Art Howe from playing them and, as a kicker, “Menechino, Hiljus, Tam are all being sent down.” That was just me projecting, though, wishing we could disappear a fifth of the roster and, a montage or two later, win twenty in a row.
Terrifying? Maybe frustrating. Either way, Gore from Washington opened our eyes to something deeply disturbing.
The inconvenient truth of the Mets at the moment is they’ve lost four in a row, their last two against the Eastern Seaboard version of the Oakland Athletics, the Washington Nationals, who, since landing in New York themselves, have forgotten they were supposed to lay down and die for the benefit of the mighty, mighty Mets. Led by MacKenzie Gore, neither a chad nor a doubt was left hanging. Gore won. The Nats won. For a second night in a row amid the chill winds off Flushing Bay, the Mets appeared to barely compete. It was a 4-1 blowout.
Kodai Senga, once our secret weapon, seems to have suffered from exposure. It took five starts for the ghost fork to become familiar to opposing hitters. Senga’s still got the stuff, but he needs the command. It’s a little evocative of Sid Fernandez c. 1985 wherein El Sid (a real person, not a movie character) could baffle hitters but also be waited out by them. Senga struck out seven over five innings, an impressive number. He also walked four, an alarming amount.
The Mets’ hitters, meanwhile, accomplished next to nothing at the hands of Gore, the leading prospect the Padres had to surrender to acquire Juan Soto. In context, it wasn’t a bad exchange for Washington. The context that concerned us was the six-inning stint Gore threw Wednesday, with one run allowed on four hits and two walks amid ten Met strikeouts. The Mets air promotional spots roughly every half-inning insisting, “Baseball hits different here.” Maybe it would if it could make meaningful contact.
Even the one Met run was a bit of a gift, facilitated by an Eduardo Escobar triple that eluded Lane Thomas in right when it was still a catchable line drive. You’ll take what you can get. In Oakland, at the beginning of the California trip, the A’s gifted the Mets a year’s supply of walks (giddily accepted) and then proceeded to be not quite good enough to overcome one-run deficits in the following two games. I was left thinking after our sweep at Possum Central Coliseum that a slightly more seaworthy foe would have taken one or both of those games, but you play who you play.
The Mets played a slightly more seaworthy foe the last two nights and lost both times. Long season and all that — there’s a reason baseball movies don’t rush the dramatic surge in fortunes — but this doesn’t look like the team that went to Los Angeles and overcame everything but vintage Clayton Kershaw. Nor did it resemble the walking, homering offensive machine that allowed us to not dwell on Senga’s less than wholly effective outings in Northern California, where 26 runs were plated on Kodai’s behalf. It certainly doesn’t look like the team we considered, based on the 2023 roster’s similarity to 2022’s cast, capable of slowly grinding opponents to a fine dust. Perhaps that’s harder to do when you have only 20 seconds between pitches to inflict your core competencies on a game’s direction. Not sure right now what this team looks like beyond naggingly frustrating.
Maybe Joey Lucchesi will save us again. He always has in 2023.
Well-earned fan angst is the throughline in the new episode of National League Town, available wherever else you need your baseball anxiety semi-reasonably articulated.
by Jason Fry on 25 April 2023 10:17 pm
The good news: The Mets fixed the New York-Presbyterian patch, the one that was unreadable and looked vaguely like an ad for the Phillies, Dunkin’ Donuts or some nightmarish chimera of those two entities. It annoyed Steve Cohen, and when you’re Steve Cohen and you’re annoyed, people hop to it.
The other good news: Nope, that was it.
The Mets got back from the West Coast Monday morning at around 6 a.m. So were we repeatedly informed by GKR, mercifully returned as accompaniment after two days of interloper announcers from national empty-calorie networks. Keith Hernandez led the charge, talking repeatedly about how returning to the East Coast after a long time near the Pacific is hard, and how teams tend to come back a little flat.
A little flat? The Mets looked like they’d returned to New York on the underside of a steamroller. They could have been slipped under your door five at a time. Edwin Abbott Abbott could have written a book about them.
They didn’t hit — though Josiah Gray might have something to do with that, as he looked like he’s figured a few things out since we last saw him in his accustomed role as a Met punching bag. They didn’t pitch — Jose Butto couldn’t get his changeup over and Jimmy Yacabonis had the roof cave in on him, though he had a little help bringing it down. And they didn’t field — honestly, when Francisco Lindor and Luis Guillorme both make misplays in the field, you know it’s not your night.
They didn’t do anything that resembled anything you’d pay money to see — the game was simultaneously boring and infuriating, a slow-motion car crash to which I’ve already dedicated more words than is deserved.
Still, way to fix that patch.
by Greg Prince on 24 April 2023 1:31 pm
Francisco Alvarez went up and got it. The pitch, from Tyler Rogers, was measured at 3.87 feet off the ground. It looked higher. It flew higher. It flew over Oracle Park’s left field fence, which is eight feet high. After going up, getting it, and sending it for an aerial ride, Alvarez had every right to feel at least as tall as the wall he’d just cleared. Francisco in San Francisco had broken through some barriers. His first home run of the season. The first homer of the season for any Mets catcher. The first extra-base hit of the season for any Mets catcher. Alvarez, Tomás Nido, Omar Narváez, Duffy Dyer — you name them, none of them had done anything more than single. And they hadn’t singled all that much as New York Mets since 2023 began. When 2023 began, Alvarez was a Syracuse Met for the moment, a half-baked Met a moment later, rushed out of the oven lukewarm because Narvaez had gotten hurt. The Met prospect of Met prospects was back with the big club before he was ready, not unlike the scenario that developed at the end of last September, save for the overtones of desperation that enveloped the Mets as they traveled to Atlanta.
Little this April has alleviated the impression that young Francisco isn’t fully honed to face big league hurlers. The eye test says he’s looked lost. The numbers suggest the eyes are operating 20/20. As Sunday night’s game got going, a friend messaged me: “I saw something I’ve never seen before. When they showed Alvarez’s stats, he was -29 OPS+ I’ve never seen anyone with a negative OPS+.” No, you don’t detect that kind of stat that often, especially with pitchers having exited the statistical column in question. In a nutshell, 100 is an average OPS+. Position players aren’t doing very well relative to the rest of the league if their on-base percentage and their slugging percentage taken together spits out an OPS+ in positive double-digits.
To be showing what Alvarez was showing entering Sunday evening, you’d usually have to be somebody who isn’t expected to hit at all. Last season, the Mets had four bit players who produced an OPS+ that started with a minus-sign. If you’re more than a bit player and your OPS+ languishes beneath zero, you’re eventually not going to play even a bit. Two (Deven Marrero and Travis Blankenhorn) combined for nine plate appearances, the epitome of a small sample size. Two (Terrance Gore and Ender Inciarte) mostly pinch-ran. Nine years ago, when Bartolo Colon took swings on a regular basis and his batting helmet flew off his head nearly as often, his OPS+ over 69 plate appearances was -77. Two years later, in the season he homered and generally appeared competent with a bat in his hands, Bart had jacked it up to -30 in 65 PAs. It wasn’t going to tame the universal DH tide, but you can’t say Colon didn’t improve.
There’s hope for everybody. There’s hope for Francisco Alvarez. There’s hope, there’s expectation, and there’s the acknowledgement that, at 21 and claiming fewer than 50 games of Triple-A experience, the kid is going to go through this phase of his major league offensive life as undercooked and overmatched. He blended both states, grounding into a one-out bases-loaded double play on a three-two pitch from Giants starter Ross Stripling to kill a Met rally in the second inning. Somebody’s working somebody when the count goes full. One potential ball from giving up a run or more, the pitcher had this hitter right where he wanted him.
Two innings later, Francisco again came to bat with the bases loaded, again against Stripling, this time with nobody out. The Mets operate with a short bench. It was early. The pitcher was obviously in trouble. “Can’t we pinch-hit here?” streaked across my mind. I’ll be as patient as possible with a 21-year-old top-ranked prospect in the medium to long haul. In the situation that existed at that instant, the Mets trailing by one and me having been reminded how an OPS+ can plunge below zero, I had no patience. I didn’t really think the ramifications or logistics through. I just wanted Francisco Alvarez to not bat with the bases loaded.
This time, Stripling had Alvarez in a one-two hole before striking him out swinging. Gabe Kapler proceeded to change his pitcher (Rogers for Stripling), Buck Showalter proceeded to pinch-hit for his next batter (Mark Canha for Luis Guillorme) and, in a matter of minutes, helped along by an Old Friend (clank, clank, clank went Michael Conforto’s defensive folly), the Mets turned what had been a 2-1 deficit into a 3-2 lead. They were ahead by one in spite of Alvarez.
In the bottom of the fourth, they were behind by one again. In the top of the sixth, Alvarez was still being given the benefit of every doubt, though letting your starting catcher bat with two out and nobody on and only one catcher on the bench with another three innings to go isn’t an extravagant vote of confidence. It’s just a baseball game. It’s ordinary managerial behavior. What was to be lost by another Alvarez groundout or strikeout?
We didn’t find out because this time Francisco found his pitch, up in his eyes. Alvarez is listed at 5-foot-10. If the pitch was 3.87 feet off the ground, it wasn’t really up in his eyes, but we’re going with the eye test here. It was, at the very least, a high strike (depending on home plate umpire Roberto Ortiz’s capricious interpretation of the zone). Wherever it was, the rookie who probably shouldn’t be engaged in a major league timeshare this month, went up and got it. That’s what he’ll have to do on occasion. Go up and get it, literally and metaphorically. The Mets did the “up” part when they promoted him. Their other healthy MLB-experienced catcher at Syracuse, Michael Perez, lingers outside the 40-man roster. When Narvaez got hurt, the big club itself was the one out of options.
Alvarez, who came up when the Mets arrived at Citi Field for their Home Opener, might fit better in his road uniform, because he’s existed in a gray area. Not exactly the starter. Not exactly the backup. Not exactly who you want in the box with the bases loaded. Not exactly who you want to see being kept in reserve at this stage of his career. This stage, incidentally, is still pretty larval.
Francisco’s homer knotted the score at four, which was great. The Giants unknotted the score to make it 5-4 in the eighth. Less great. Alvarez led off the ninth. Camilo Doval struck him out on four pitches. He also struck out Mark Canha and grounded out Brandon Nimmo. It took a team effort to lose the final game of an otherwise satisfactory (7-3) road trip. Tylor Megill wasn’t sharp the first four innings. Drew Smith surrendered that go-ahead run late. Showalter said something about preserving David Robertson and Adam Ottavino for another day instead of deploying one of them to keep things tied at four in the eighth. Neither veteran pitched at all in this four-game series, so we’re left to wonder if their experienced arms are altogether OK. Experience isn’t always everything.
Promise is something to behold. Alvarez has promise. Brett Baty has promise. He has yet to light it up, either, in his second unplanned go-round. The short video clips from Syracuse are so tantalizing when we see guys like these (a cohort that includes Mark Vientos and Ronny Mauricio) clear fences and circle bases. We tend to forget our minor league stars are facing minor league pitching. We don’t ask for details as we dream on our kids. We and they inevitably wake up to pitchers who are more likely to know what they’re doing than the fellas in the International League. Baty’s OPS+, for the moment, sits at a scant 45. Alvarez’s has surged to 11.
That’s for the moment. Nobody except the wholly unreasonable is asking these kids to carry this club. This club carries itself pretty well as is. Carrying their share of the load will come with time. Our patience is appreciated if not always forthcoming.
by Jason Fry on 23 April 2023 11:24 am
I don’t remember when the thought first crawled into my brain. It might have been when our starting pitcher had strained his neck watching another ball explore the outermost confines of Oracle Park. Or perhaps it was when said starting pitcher was chasing down a ball caroming between fielders while Giants ran around the bases with more merriment than I was feeling. Neither of us those necessarily narrows it down with exactitude, so let’s just say it was somewhere during an excruciating 80-minute stretch of televised sports best described as “baseball-adjacent.”
Whatever the timing, here was the thought: I’ve never seen David Peterson and Aaron Heilman in the same place. Hmm. Do you think it’s possible that….
Ha ha. OK. Of course not. Heilman is 44 now, and whatever he’s doing, I sure hope he’s not on his couch remembering what a pain in the butt West Coast trips were. More than that, Heilman was one of the first Mets I identified as a Jonah — he hasn’t been a Met for a decade and a half, but I can close my eyes and see his hangdog mien and slumped shoulders as if I last saw them yesterday. Peterson isn’t a Jonah. He doesn’t go about his business with a little black cloud eager to dump rain, and you don’t automatically expect disaster when he reports for duty. He’s just a young pitcher trying to overcome the limitations of his initial skill set while enemy teams backed by ferociously good scouting and analytics departments work to exploit those limitations. That’s so much harder to do than those of us moaning “THROW STRIKES!” from the cheap seats or our living rooms would guess.
But I still couldn’t get the thought out of my head. Because, yeah, I was the guy moaning “THROW STRIKES!” from my living room. Right now Peterson is inefficient and frustrating, missing corners and the top of the zone and then leaving pitches in the middle, with disastrous results. I booted him off my fantasy team in the middle innings; the Mets might want to do the same with their actual team, giving Peterson’s innings to Joey Lucchesi and offering Jose Butto another turn in the upcoming stretch of ALL PITCHERS ON DECK. Or Dylan Bundy. Or, well, someone who isn’t David Peterson.
Some of that is fan pique, which I acknowledge falls a fair distance short of substantive analysis but certainly has its place here. (If poor Aaron Heilman is reading this, he’s rolled his eyes and muttered, “Dude, let it go already” in the exact same tone with which I urged that strikes be thrown.) But it also might be a good idea: Peterson’s slider is MIA, it’s affecting the rest of his approach, and it has to be affecting his confidence.
The late Marty Noble once answered a mailbag question about Heilman by pointing out the Mets didn’t have better options and asking the aggrieved fan, “Where do you want him sent? Prison?” Fair enough, and it’s true that now as then, better options aren’t immediately obvious. But maybe the Mets ought to explore them anyway, while Peterson searches for that slider in Syracuse. Baseball’s really hard, from out pitches turned disobedient to enemy hitters doing the pitiless things they’re paid to do, and at least for now, Peterson looks like he could use a setting where the wattage of the spotlights are lower along with the stakes.
by Greg Prince on 22 April 2023 12:00 pm
What Joey Lucchesi did on Friday night was, in the pitching-short present, necessary and appreciated. Off the radar for nearly two years while he underwent and rehabbed from Tommy John surgery, Joey the Churve stormed back from obscurity and Syracuse to do more for the Mets in one outing than he had done the whole time he was healthy in 2021 — and do more than any starting pitcher has done for them in 2023. There was a period when a starter going seven innings was a pretty good day at the office, but nothing that stopped the presses. That period hasn’t existed since people knew what stopping the presses meant.
Although I saw Lucchesi’s feat in San Francisco compared to Matt Harvey coming back from a year of inactivity in 2015 and shutting down the first opponent he’d seen since 2013, it reminded me more of a game from 1975, when Mets were Mets, and Tom Seaver went at least seven innings in 27 of his 35 starts, completing 15 of them. I don’t need much of a nudge to be reminded of games from 1975, of course, even if they weren’t started by Seaver. The one I was moved to think of was from the middle of August of that year. It was pitched by Craig Swan, who was making his season debut. Swan was judged a disappointment in 1974, with nobody realizing he was pitching with a stress fracture in his right elbow. Next time you hear about precautionary imaging at the drop of a hangnail, remember that promising young pitchers used to be encouraged to rub dirt on whatever hurt. My, how far we’ve come as a species.
After being diagnosed correctly and having his cast removed, Swan spent all of 1975 regaining his strength and velocity at Tidewater, leading to his recall on August 16, against the Giants at Shea Stadium. His return set a promising precedent for the likes of Lucchesi generations later: eight-and-a-third innings, two earned runs (one let in by closer Bob Apodaca) and his first win in what felt like forever. It had been about 14 months. Swan was 24 and had been absent from the Mets plans until injuries forced their hand. It might as well have been forever.
These days, at Mets World Headquarters and its mobile locations across the continent, seven innings is almost unheard of. Hell, we hadn’t heard of it all year. But through Lucchesi-enabled ears, we heard an outing that lasted longer than anybody else’s: not just seven bullpen-preserving innings and nine strikeouts, but no runs allowed. None! Who does that in these parts anymore? Not the suspended Max Scherzer. Not the mending Justin Verlander. Not anybody else who’s taken the ball to date. They’ve all handed the ball back to the manager no later than the end of the sixth inning. Joey sorted his pitches (he’s not just for churves anymore) and befuddled the Giants. It bears repeating that they didn’t score in any of the seven innings Lucchesi was on the mound being “sick, man,” as the lefty hurler put it, availing himself of one of those phrases that means the opposite of what you might infer.
You’d think a pitcher who had to battle injury to pitch again in the majors might want to avoid any hint that he’s not feeling his best.
Nevertheless, all was well with Joey and his pitching in the Mets’ 7-0 win. Take it from his first baseman, who affirmed Lucchesi was “straight carving,” bringing “funk” and “uniqueness” to his delivery. Pete Alonso ought to know. He’s been carving up pitching himself of late, even more than when he began to bring both the funk and the noise to the Met record book four seasons ago.
The uniqueness of Pete’s achievements seem to speak for themselves. Following his wallop to dead center off Anthony DeScalafani in the fifth, Alonso is at 10 home runs after 21 games, reaching double-digits nine days before the 30th of April. Few sluggers do that. Met sluggers, rare birds and Bears that they are, have never done that. In the long view, Pete is up to 156 home runs in a career that by conventional standards isn’t much removed from its early stages. (Or maybe it just seems that way to me.)
When Pete homered the evening before, for No. 155, it rearranged a Met list that’s had one constant since approximately forever, even longer than Swan had to wait between wins from 1974 to 1975. Alonso’s second-most recent dinger placed him alone in fifth place on the all-time Mets home run list. Keep Pete a Met long enough, he’ll be alone in first, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. It’s enough to note who Pete is ahead of right now.
On September 4, 1976, it was a big deal that Craig Swan’s teammate Dave Kingman had homered. Not an unusual deal in the vast sweep of Kingman’s career, which would go on to encompass 442 home runs, but this one was big for a singular reason at the moment it was hit. Kingman had been out with torn ligaments in his left thumb between July 19 and August 27. When he went on the DL, Sky King (the nickname Dave preferred over Kong) led the world in home runs with 32. The National League title was in the bag, just waiting for a twist-tie. The National League mark for one season, 56 — Hack Wilson’s total in 1930 — was legitimately in sight. The Mets weren’t going anywhere in 1976, but there appeared to be no limit for Sky.
Then Dave dives for a fly ball, and the thumb gets hurt, and you can kiss Hack Wilson goodbye. More disturbing is the twist-tie is no longer firmly in our grasp, either. While Kingman is sidelined for the back end of July and the bulk of August, Mike Schmidt makes up an eight-tater deficit and ties Dave, 32-32. Our first National League home run crown, out of the bag and rolling around on the table, is truly up for grabs.
On Saturday, September 4, a game with such powerful implications that a distracted Bar Mitzvah guest slips away to a pay phone for updates via 976-1313 (I had to let the Bar Mitzvah boy, a fellow Mets fan, know what was going on at Shea), sees Schmidt grab the lead, 33-32, when he homers off Nino Espinosa in the sixth inning. But then, in the seventh, Kingman evens the score in the only race that matters, belting his 33rd home run, off Ron Schueler. The Mets win the game, which is swell, but more importantly, considering the 14½ lengths the first-place Phils have on the third-place Mets, Dave is tied for the top in his category.
Little remarked upon if mentioned at all that afternoon was who else Dave Kingman tied when he homered. No. 33 on the year was also No. 69 since he’d been a Met. It had been seven years since 69 embedded itself in our consciousness as the nicest number in the Mets’ numerical lexicon, but there was more to it than world championship echoes. Ron Swoboda, you see, had hit 69 home runs in his Met career. That tidy sum, through September 3, 1976, amounted to the fifth-most in Mets history. The Mets were in their fifteenth season, having spent most of their time copiously avoiding the other side of the fence when at bat. Ed Kranepool had only a month earlier become the first player to hit 100 home runs as a Met. Ed Kranepool was in his fifteenth season, too.
So you had Krane, you had Cleon Jones (93), you had Tommie Agee (82), you had John Milner (80), and you had Swoboda. That was the Top Five Mets Home Run chart.
Then, on September 4, 1976, you had Kingman politely asking Swoboda to scooch over and share fifth place. Two days after that, at Wrigley Field, Dave decided he wasn’t crazy about sharing and took fifth for himself, launching his 34th homer of the season and the 70th of his Met career. This was your up-to-the-minute franchise home run ranking:
Ed Kranepool 100
Cleon Jones 93
Tommie Agee 82
John Milner 80
Dave Kingman 70
Dave was fifth all by himself, and would remain one of the Top Five Mets sluggers of all time in perpetuity.
Perpetuity covered his departure amid the Midnight Massacre, by which time Kingman — who was edged out by Schmidt for the 1976 crown, 38-37 — had totaled 82 Met home runs; his boom-and-bust exploits as a Padre, an Angel, a Yankee and a Cub following the transactions of June 15, 1977; the return of Sky King in 1981 and the 22 home runs he clouted that strike-shortened season; 1982, when Dave not only tied his own single-season club record of 37, but finally became the first Met to lead the league in a triple-crown category; the 13 he hit in 1983 before Keith Hernandez’s presence made first baseman Dave totally superfluous at Shea; his next act as the A’s DH; the rise of Darryl Strawberry; the emergence of Howard Johnson; the acquisition of Mike Piazza; the sustained if truncated excellence of David Wright; and everything until this current Met trip to California.
Because during this current Met trip to California, Dave Kingman stopped being, statistically speaking, one of the Top Five Mets sluggers of all time and stopped owning one of the five highest Mets career home run totals. When the trip started, that list looked this:
Darryl Strawberry 252
David Wright 242
Mike Piazza 220
Howard Johnson 192
Dave Kingman 154
Perpetuity expired on the West Coast in April of 2023. Pete Alonso pushed it toward extinction in Oakland, where Dave Kingman had revived his power stroke once the Mets ate his contract and let him go to whoever wanted him. The 1984 A’s, somewhere between Billy Ball and the Bash Brothers, picked him up, and Kingman commenced to do the only thing anybody ever really expected of him. In three seasons almost exclusively designated hitting, Dave bashed exactly a hundred homers, or as many as Kranepool collected to lead the Mets as a franchise over an approximate fourteen-year span. I thought it would be appropriate if Pete could pass him in L.A., where Dave enjoyed his most legendary night as a Met, socking three homers and driving in eight runs on a Friday night in 1976, but the Polar Bear settled for several hits of the non-homer variety against the Dodgers (unlike Dave, Pete often reaches base without circling them). Instead, Alonso waited for the series in San Francisco, facing the team with whom Kingman got his start in 1971, the team that sold him to the Mets in 1975. No. 155 came in the series opener. No. 156 came the next night, Lucchesi’s big one. No. 157 and beyond are welcome to arrive with whatever haste Pete Alonso can arrange. Whoever’s pitching will definitely appreciate the support.
Now, for the first time in nearly 47 years, when you list the five leading home run hitters in Mets history…
Darryl Strawberry 252
David Wright 242
Mike Piazza 220
Howard Johnson 192
Pete Alonso 156 and blessedly counting
…you don’t see Dave Kingman’s name. But Mets fans who saw him go deep still see that swing. When it connected, the ball soared roughly as high as those United Airlines planes whose roominess the 6-foot-6 Dave smilingly extolled in commercials when he began gaining fame for scaling the heights of the Met home run chart. Kingman didn’t always present a persona one would describe as advertiser-friendly or media-friendly or, at infamous intervals of his professional life, minimally friendly in general, but the way he piled up home runs won fans and influenced little leaguers. You swung for the fences as a kid in and around New York in the latter half of the 1970s, you were accused of trying to be Dave Kingman. When you succeeded, you took it as a compliment.
Few succeeded at what Kingman was best at like Kingman, which is to say the Mets got him to hit home runs and he hit home runs. Boy, did he hit home runs. The number went unmatched until Darryl eclipsed 154 in 1988, and it went unsurpassed by fewer than a literal handful until Alonso came along and became unstoppable. Yet giving way on the all-time home run list and not being among the Top Five any longer doesn’t detract from what Dave did, or could do, or had you sure he would do as a Met. I watched the Mets play games at or from Shea Stadium from 1969 through 2008. Dave Kingman was definitely the first Met who didn’t shock me by hitting a home run there, maybe the only Met who didn’t intrinsically surprise me by hitting a home run there.
There’d be some gifted hitters who I understood were capable of homering at Shea, and a select group who did it relatively often, but Kingman was the only one who I expected, all things being equal, to hit one out. Maybe Straw or Piazza with a game on the line, given their proclivity for meshing power with drama, but in terms of simply “he’s gonna hit a home run here” captivating my thought process in a random inning on a random night, that was Dave Kingman above everybody else. I’d look at him through that prism on the road, too, but Shea was such a not home run hitters’ park. Every clip I see of a Met homering at Shea, I’m still amazed that ball gets out of there. Except when Kingman swings and makes contact.
Pete Alonso plays his home games in a ballpark and in an era where home runs don’t seem that surprising. I don’t take the frequency with which he hits them for granted by any means, although I suppose at this point, you could be forgiven for almost counting on a long ball now and then. It’s not all Pete brings to the plate. Alonso is more of an all-around hitter than Kingman ever was as a Met, and now he has more home runs than Kingman ever had as a Met. Knock wood, he’ll have more home runs than anybody ever had as a Met, and we won’t have to wait forever for them to take off, no matter how long it takes them to land.
But I swear: there was only one Dave Kingman. I mean that as a compliment.
by Jason Fry on 21 April 2023 8:54 am
Loyalty is strange.
Not in the sense of feeling it for men decades younger than me, men I think I know but don’t in any way that matters. Though that’s certainly strange too.
No, I was thinking about it in the context of how that loyalty gets transferred when those young men change — sometimes willingly and not — out of one set of faintly ridiculous pajamas and into a new set. They keep doing their jobs and behaving more or less as they did a little while ago, only now that loyalty has been transferred to new young men about whom I know a whole lot less.
I have a few hours invested in the likes of Kodai Senga, John Curtiss and Jeff Brigham. I gave many, many more hours of my life to cheering on Wilmer Flores, Michael Conforto and J.D. Davis. (We’ll leave poor star-crossed Darin Ruf out of this conversation.)
Flores literally grew up as a Met minor leaguer, learning English by watching “Friends” re-runs; maintained his dignity while being asked to play positions he had no business playing; wept when he learned from cellphone-wielding fans that he’d been traded; and then authored one of the signature moments of the last decade when he followed his walkoff homer against the Nats with a heartfelt pull at the METS across his chest.
I watched Conforto as a Cyclone down on Coney Island, then as a Met with my heart in my throat in the World Series because I remembered him being in single A just moments earlier. He was my favorite player for several years, the guy I kept predicting greatness for and whose cause I espoused with ardent fury when the Mets mishandled him. That greatness proved more theoretical than realized, derailed by bad luck and injuries, but I still needed a moment when I learned he was officially no longer ours.
Davis also never quite ignited as a Met, but provided seemingly endless moments of entertainment and surrealism — heckling opponents in his reedy, not-made-for-heckling voice, all but urging Met fans to storm the Bastille after a walkoff, and offering general merriment as Pete Alonso‘s sidekick, Sun Bear to the Polar Bear. (Though as Greg noted, Solar Bear was right there.) Even his nickname was the stuff of amused double takes — Jonathan Davis’s middle name is Gregory.
By comparison:
Senga comes from Japan, seems like a good dude, and throws that ghost fork.
Curtiss signed with us and spent a year waiting for his elbow to knit, during which there’s no way I could have picked him out of a police lineup.
Brigham was a Marlin and shares his name with a New England chain that’s kind of a JV Friendly’s.
And yet as the Mets and Giants battled it out, I was rooting for Senga, Curtiss and Brigham to succeed and — after initial, heartfelt applause — hoping Flores, Conforto and Davis would fail. On the face of it that doesn’t make a lick of sense.
Such contradictions are easier ruminating upon when your team is comfortably ahead, which the Mets were … twice. They built both leads using a dynamic that it was nice to see them tap back into, spending their first rotation of ABs carefully studying a pitcher and then ambushing him in the second go-round.
Sean Manaea was the first victim, undone in the fourth by two-run homers from Alonso and Eduardo Escobar and a run-scoring double from Brandon Nimmo, hot enough that objects near him are suddenly aflame.
Senga repaid his teammates’ generosity by having one of those seemingly inexplicable innings that used to plague Al Leiter, where both principal and perplexed fans are left wondering why said principal has apparently forgotten how to pitch. Blake Sabol and LaMonte Wade Jr. homered, Mike Yastrzemski singled in a third run, and a Senga wild pitch brought home Conforto, sliding across the plate on his now cream-colored belly.
Some harm, no foul: After sizing up newcomer Tristan Beck for a bit the Mets blitzed him, running up a brand-new five-run advantage. At which point your chronicler, who is Officially Too Old for West Coast Trips, bid them and the land of the awake adieu and checking the score once rebooted with sleep and coffee. Turns out they won, with the guys I barely know in gray and orange and blue beating the guys I know well who now wear the wrong unis. And since I am mildly alert for the first morning in quite a while, feels like I won too.
by Greg Prince on 20 April 2023 10:33 am
The man used sweat and rosin, he said. He said it a lot. He repeated it enough so that I believed him, which doesn’t always work. The pitcher doth protest too much, methinks might be applicable here, except the pitcher pitches for the Mets and Met-think is how methinks. Besides, this is Max Scherzer in his sixteenth season, the majority of those spent as an ace of aces. He’s suddenly sticking substance he’s not supposed to all over his pitching hand after several starts already this season when this didn’t seem to be an issue?
Pitchers will look for an edge, particularly late in their career, maybe if they haven’t been as sharp as all get-out, especially, you’d think, if the pitcher was coping with discomfort that had pushed back his spot in the rotation. Yet I’m not buying any of that as a likely explanation for whatever the umpires decided was awry in L.A. Wednesday. I don’t know that Max Scherzer is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever watched pitch in my life, but I do sense he is not, as he put it, enough of “an absolute idiot” to get checked for stickiness in the first place; be told to take care of it; take care of it as MLB officials inspected him taking care of it; and then return to the field with gobs of verboten goo.
Yet the man was ejected from the dual shutout he was engaging in with Noah Syndergaard, speaking of storylines shunted to the rear by umpire Phil Cuzzi, self-appointed crusader for clean living among pitchers. Max, who’d been missing from action for nine days, was rolling along after wriggling from trouble in the first inning. The second and third were so clean that you’d think they were scrubbed with alcohol. Max never saw the mound in the fourth, having been asked to remove himself from his place of business. When he’ll return is up for grabs in light of this sticky-wicket contretemps and the ten-game suspension it’s supposed to automatically trigger.
The Mets continued to play their game against the Dodgers on Wednesday afternoon, downgrading our half of the glamour of Scherzer v. Syndergaard to Yacabonis, et al…, not quite the same thing, but somehow efficient enough. Thor, as we used to call the opposing pitcher, wasn’t his old bowl of doom self in terms of velocity, but the wandering Norseman was effective if not evocative of the days when we hung on his every golden lock. Keeping his own once-famous ass out of the jackpot, Syndergaard gave up only a pair of runs in six innings, both scoring when Brandon Nimmo took him deep with Francisco Alvarez on first base. My first thought was how appropriate it was that Brandon should homer off Noah in that they used to be super buddy-buddy. My second thought was, wait, that was Conforto, not Nimmo.
It was all Nimmo, eventually. Brandon went 5-for-5 against Syndergaard and succeeding Dodger arms. Meanwhile, the post-Max pack, led for two-and-two-thirds by Jimmy the Yak, picked up the Scherzerless slack. A potential ace tour de force became a bullpen game, and for the last six innings, Jimmy Yacabonis plus Jeff Brigham, Drew Smith, David Robertson and Adam Ottavino did the best thing relief pitchers can do: they got the job done. Nimmo’s exploits worked in harmony with Mark Canha (two RBIs) and Tommy Pham (key sac fly) to bolster Max’s supporting cast en route to a 5-3 rubber game victory. Afterward, when Scherzer paused from claiming perfectly permissible “sweat and rosin” long enough to answer a question about how well Yacabonis pitched in his place on no notice, Max smiled and said the long reliever definitely deserved a steak dinner, presumably on him.
That’s really nice, assuming Max washes his hands before passing the potatoes.
The Mets are five games over .500, a level they never approached 60 years ago, but 1963 was its own kind of fascinating Mets year, as you’ll hear all about in the It Happens in Threes segment on the new episode of National League Town.
by Jason Fry on 19 April 2023 1:12 am
Meditations on time before and during watching Clayton Kershaw toy with various Mets:
The Dodgers are forever. I started watching baseball in earnest in 1976, when I was seven, and learned the game by memorizing the backs of baseball cards, scouring a cinderblock-sized Baseball Encyclopedia, and devouring various books checked out from the Emma S. Clark Public Library. (Tug McGraw‘s Screwball was an early favorite; so too, if I remember correctly, was an as-told-to book by Carl Mays, the Yankee pitcher who fatally beaned Ray Chapman, because go figure.) It’s amazing to think that when I started watching baseball the Dodgers were only beginning their 19th season in Los Angeles — we’ve been penning this blog almost as long as that. The Dodgers seemed eternal to me then as they do now, an exotic baseball species in their minimalist blue and white ensemble, punctuated by that red number and the white dot on the cap. It’s a uniform so perfect that it’s hard to remember that it’s the product of a lengthy, stop-start evolution and not something, say, handed down by Abner Doubleday on a village green one spring day.
Dodger Stadium really is forever. The Dodgers’ home is as old as the Mets, who are on their third stadium, and somehow it still feels like visiting the future. There’s the strangeness of its setting — who put a mountain in the middle of this endless sprawling city of palm trees? — and the seemingly effortless cool of its jet-age lines and dimensions, with that wavelike pavilion in the outfield and the hexagonal scoreboards always reminding me of Eeno Saarinen somehow. Dodger Stadium is the third-oldest park behind Wrigley and Fenway, but those parks feel like the anachronisms they are while the Dodgers’ home still seems new, and probably always will.
Time moves differently for rookies. As fans we want to believe that people can change in ways experience has taught us they don’t. That journeyman hitter who’s spent eight seasons unable to lay off pitches out of the zone isn’t going to have a eureka moment in his ninth season, no matter what a few extra walks in spring training make us want to believe. At a certain point, players are what they are — they’re only people, after all. But young players are an exception: With them, you sometimes can see the learning curve getting traveled. I was thinking that Monday night watching Brett Baty in the field and at the plate. After his insta-famous first swing in 2022, the game sometimes looked like it was moving a little quickly for Baty, which just meant he was new to all this. But Baty really did look different in spring training, in Syracuse and in L.A. — quicker to the ball in the field, more disciplined sizing up pitches at the plate, and more sure-footed going about every aspect of his business.
Time moves differently for veterans too. It’s been painful watching Eduardo Escobar hit in bad luck when he’s been hitting at all, but watching him navigate the beginning of the Baty era has been an object lesson in both cheer and class. (And since we’re talking third base, how is this the fifth season since David Wright retired? He was here just a minute ago.) It’s never easy to lose your job, let alone to do so because your recent performance is being quantified a zillion different ways and evaluated by thousands and thousands of eyes both professional and amateur. Escobar had a tough 2022 season marked by personal issues I’m glad we don’t know everything about, a bewildering offseason in which he had to look over his shoulder at not only Baty but also Carlos Correa, and now this season has proved trying too. Everything he’s done in response has shown you why he’s revered as a teammate. I’ve grown less sentimental about personnel as I’ve grown older as a fan, but I find myself hoping that Escobar can succeed for us as some combination of designated hitter, platoon player and defensive replacement.
Remember me? Speaking of sentiment, Wednesday’s matinee will feature Max Scherzer against Noah Syndergaard, a matchup of pitchers facing their former teams. It still feels shocking to me that Syndergaard is no longer ours and, if we’re being honest about it, no longer Syndergaard. Remember when he hit two homers in this park? When he came up comparing his mechanics to a trebuchet? When he threw that ungodly slider that made you think someone had found the MLB The Show cheat codes? When he was ready to fight each and every Kansas City Royal? When he grumped to a less-than-convinced Tom Hallion about just trying to throw a fucking fastball? Oh how I loved him — and oh how it pains me to admit that I’ll watch Wednesday’s game a lot more worried about what’s going on with Scherzer’s scapula than with evaluating Syndergaard’s attempt to become a finesse pitcher. That’s partially because Syndergaard now wears the wrong uniform, but it’s also that I can’t bear to think about it. Baseball is about loss and pitchers break, and while I always knew Syndergaard’s UCL would do what so many UCLs have done before, I’ve never quite gotten over it.
Clayton Kershaw doesn’t care about time. Well, at least for one night he didn’t. Kershaw started off Tuesday night watching Jason Heyward botch a Brandon Nimmo flyball for a three-base error, coolly struck out the next three to keep the Mets off the board, and then was essentially untouchable in winning his 200th game. I wish the Mets had won, or done much of anything in not winning, but they had no chance. That was all Kershaw, and one day — though maybe not this day — I’ll tell people I was lucky to see it, and him.
by Greg Prince on 18 April 2023 11:48 am
“Do you have any other ideas? It’s getting late.”
“Can’t we use the downtrodden team again?”
“Nah, a three-episode arc is enough. Besides, the idea that you’d need to eke out one-run wins in consecutive episodes, the second of them in extra innings while the ancestors of the downtrodden team that beat the ancestors of the visiting heroes are watching stretched credulity enough.”
“But it worked.”
“The audiences won’t watch the same thing again and again.”
“Hmm…oh, here’s something…”
“What, whaddaya got?”
“The visiting heroes leave the downtrodden setting of the downtrodden team and go to a TOTALLY different place, a place where everything is sparkling and gleaming — not a possum in sight — and instead of expecting to get beat, they expect to beat you.”
“Uh-huh.”
“And, um…”
“What? We’re gonna need more than ‘um…’”
“OK, the haughty, privileged, high-expectations team where it’s sparkling and gleaming is led by a villain.”
“What kind of villain?”
“A redheaded villian! Fiery red hair! Unstoppable is the word on the street.”
“What’s so villainous about him?”
“He’s really good at what he does.”
“That’s villainous?”
“The viewers will think so.”
“Why?”
“Because he’s set to do it to the visiting heroes.”
“So what do the visiting heroes do about it?”
“They…um…they succeed!”
“Isn’t that kind of predictable?”
“How is it predictable? He’s really good at what he does and they overcome him!”
“Yeah, but that’s how every episode plays out lately. Aren’t the viewers coming to expect that?”
“Research shows our viewers generally expect the worst.”
“Even when they played the downtrodden team?”
“ESPECIALLY when they played the downtrodden team.”
“Wait, aren’t the visiting heroes kind of high-expectations themselves?”
“What’s your point?”
“If the people watching think our protagonists should win all the time, how is it they bought the tension between the visiting heroes and the downtrodden team?”
“Because, according to the research, the viewers wholeheartedly believe two things at once: that the visiting heroes should never lose, and that the visiting heroes will inevitably find a way to lose.”
“That’s utterly illogical.”
“Go argue with the research.”
After a while, you just hope these plots are believable.
“We’re getting off track here. Let’s get back to this idea for the next episode. The visiting heroes are taking on the red-headed villain who’s unstoppable at the head of this haughty team the viewers don’t like. What happens besides the visiting heroes ultimately come out on top? How do we get where we need to go?”
“With a home run!”
“We’ve already done home runs. We did home runs coming out our ears in the previous arc. How many times can we go to the Polar Bear well? Seriously, if we keep leaning on the Polar Bear character, the actor’s going to want a huge raise.”
“We go with one of the characters who hasn’t had much to do yet this season.”
“Who?”
“Um…the barrel-chested hitter.”
“‘Barrel-chested’? Is that what we’re calling him now?”
“We ran it by legal and we’re OK with barrel-chested.”
“Fine. What does the barrel-chested hitter do?”
“He homers!”
“Yeah, but there’s gotta be more, some motivation, some other action.”
“The barrel-chested hitter has been walking mostly.”
“Is he panting?”
“That’s funny. Maybe we’ll use that in a later episode if he has to run. No, he just walks a lot. Walks the earth in search of knowledge, higher purpose, whatever. But this time he swings. He swings and he homers…and then, because he’s seeing the redemptive power of swinging, he swings again, and he grounds to the right side for a productive out.”
“That’s entertaining?”
“That’s effective!”
“How effective?”
“The lead goes back and forth. The unstoppable redhead isn’t as unstoppable as he’s made out to be. The swinging and the hitting is getting to him.”
“So it’s a romp?”
“No, I told you — back and forth. Remember, this is a high-expectations outfit. They’re dangerous because they’re supposed to be THAT good.”
“So the visiting heroes are in peril?”
“Yes. And their own gunslinger needs help.”
“What kind of help?”
“Bullpen help!”
“This again? We resort to the bullpen help trope by the third act in every episode.”
“Research shows the viewers buy it.”
“Who comes out of the bullpen to save the day?”
“Does it matter? They’re kind of interchangeable after a while.”
“I know, but the casting director says we can’t use the same actors every day. Try to mix them up a little. Union rules specify they can be trotted out for only so many scenes in a given shoot.”
“Not a problem. We’ll find something for the lefty to do, then the guy who everybody forgets about, then the grizzled veteran.”
“Which grizzled veteran? We have a couple of them.”
“Whichever one we didn’t use in the previous episode.”
“This was a lot easier when we had the one closer. Those climaxes wrote themselves Scored themselves, too.”
“Too bad the studio lent him out for that limited series between seasons.”
“I think we could use a strong ‘B’ story as well.”
“How about this — we set the entire showdown, all the pitching, all the hitting, all the expectations and anxieties late at night.”
“How late? It’s gotta be believable.”
“Not late where it’s going on, but late where the people who care about it most are trying to follow it.”
“What happens with them?”
“Well, as the visiting heroes are fighting off the high-expectations outfit, the folks back home are fighting off sleep. It’s a daunting battle, seemingly a losing battle, but then…”
“Yeah?”
“Um…they wake up, just in time to see the final out!”
“That’s how it ends?”
“Well, there’s a postgame show if they can stay awake just a little longer.”
“Ah, we’ll figure it out. Before I forget, insert another stunt catch in the last showdown if you think of it. Viewers seem to like those.”
“Stunt catch. Check.”
“And a fair-haired rookie type. Viewers can’t get enough of those.”
“Fair-haired rookie type. Check.”
“All in all, I think we have a satisfying episode for the time slot they gave us.”
“Fantastic. ’Cause we have a whole lot more of these to churn out before this week is over.”
by Jason Fry on 17 April 2023 8:12 am
It looked like everything had finally come together for the A’s. Not a new stadium without acres upon acres of foul ground, lots of other deficiencies and, well, possums — that’s too much to ask. And not owners more interested in building a winner than in civic extortion — ditto. But good starting pitching and timely hitting and some marvelous defense? The A’s got that, at least for one day, it looked like the combination would be enough to take down a juggernaut franchise with a payroll six times larger. One day isn’t a season, but during lean times you savor every game fate lets you snatch back.
But it wasn’t to be.
Dany Jimenez had retired Francisco Lindor for the first out of the ninth, but his 2-1 pitch to Pete Alonso was a four-seamer that sat in the middle of the plate, and when Alonso was finished with it little sprigs of yarn and shreds of cowhide descended back to Earth after a 430-foot journey to the footings of Mount Davis. That tied the game at 3 and caused an understandably dispirited Jimenez to instinctively shy from directing balls at home plate, leaving the Mets poised to take the lead with the bases loaded and Eduardo Escobar up. But Escobar banged a ball into the ground for the trademark double play, which might stand as an unfortunate end to his tenure as a starter — Brett Baty is apparently ticketed to join the Mets in Los Angeles.
In the bottom of the inning Jimmy Yacabonis made his Mets debut and it looked like the A’s might prevail after all: Yacabonis threw five straight balls and then surrendered a single. But the newest Met found his footing and got help from Brandon Nimmo, who came flying across the outfield grass for his second superb catch of the day. (Oakland’s Tony Kemp deserves the day’s highest defensive marks for a fifth-inning robbery of Escobar, however.)
Having given Yacabonis a reprieve, in the 10th the Mets did things the hard way, scoring Escobar on a wild pitch after failing to do so more conventionally. (BTW, in addition to everything else I despise about the ghost runner, there’s something subtly cruel about sending the guy who hit into an inning-ending double play out to stand at the base he’d just been hoping to arrive at unassisted.) David Robertson then navigated a Manfred-enhanced 10th thanks to some heads-up Mets plays and A’s omissions — Ryan Noda‘s bunt got the ghost runner exorcised from third instead of moved up, and Shea Langeliers arguably should have gone on contact from third when Conner Capel spanked a ball to first with one out, forcing the Mets to make a play instead of hoping for a hit that never came.
But, as discussed in reviewing Saturday’s game, none of that is our problem to fix. The Mets departed Oakland with a series sweep and the chance to look back on some big home runs, great defensive plays and (as a bonus) an effective outing from Jose Butto, who had a much easier time than when he was thrown to the wolves in Philadelphia last season.
I just hope they checked their luggage for possums — as A’s fans will tell you, those guys wind up in all sorts of places one wouldn’t expect.
|
|