The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Thought Process No Longer Valid

So, what do I lead with when this no-hitter is over? Bob Moose in 1969? Max Scherzer in 2015? Proof that a no-hitter thrown at the Mets late in a season doesn’t necessarily preclude that season from having a successful (maybe Amazin’ly successful) postseason? That’s a tough sell. I know it’s true, but when the Mets have looked like they’ve looked for not only these eight innings when they’ve done literally nothing against Bowden Francis but for days on end, who wants to be the house optimist?

Should I compare it to Chris Heston in 2015? Yes, we did get no-hit twice en route to a pennant. The first one had more novelty to it, given that it was the first one we’d been smothered by in 22 years. We were also in the midst of a teamwide slump then, but that was in June, and the game was effectively out of reach, and the difference was that by the time it got to the ninth inning, I was kind of pulling for Chris Heston to finish the job, because what the hell, right? Maybe not right, but it’s where my head was on that night. That night, however, isn’t this afternoon. This afternoon in Toronto is in September. Nothing’s been clinched the way it was when Scherzer went medieval on our bats at the tail end of 2015. Resolution to the season isn’t far off the way it was when Heston rose from oblivion to stifle us in the promising, albeit pre-Cespedes portion of that year.

The Ed Halicki no-hitter from 1975? Not much relevance. Darryl Kile? That was a September, but the September of 1993, a year that had spiraled into hopelessness by May. Bill Stoneman’s in 1972 was also in Canada, but so what? Jim Bunning’s perfect game was historic, in its own category. Sandy Koufax was Sandy Koufax. Jim Maloney carried his into the eleventh. They say it wasn’t a no-hitter — thanks, Johnny Lewis — but I’ll bet it very much felt like one that night in 1965.

We have a few too many opposition no-hitters to reference. We don’t need another.

All we’ve got going for us after eight innings on Wednesday, September 11, 2024, where Bowden Francis’s no-hit bid is concerned is maybe he’s inherited some of that Dave Stieb come close for the Blue Jays but not get it energy. Also, the game’s not over with yet, but that feels like a technicality. The Mets allowed themselves to see all of six pitches in the eighth. The first two batters made outs after one pitch apiece. Is the bus to the airport idling so loudly that it’s distracting you fellows? I know Rogers Centre used to be called SkyDome, but do you have to sky out practically every at-bat? What a waste of Sean Manaea’s six-and-two-thirds of one-run ball, not to mention the credible relief we got from Reed Garrett and Danny Young. Maybe a 1-0 loss via no-hitter is the bottoming out this “attack” needs to get going in Philadelphia this weekend. No, I don’t know how getting no-hit would serve to jump-start the bats, but I’m grasping here. I’m going to have to write this disaster up. I need something.

About the only thing interesting left to not exactly root for but take in is hearing Keith Raad call the last out of a no-hitter. That was the main reason I rooted for Chris Heston in 2015. I wanted to hear Howie Rose do the honors, even if it was from the victimized side. Howie understood the responsibility that night. A no-hitter is a no-hitter. I think Keith gets it, too.

But that’s the smallest of consolations when we’re tied with the Braves for the final playoff spot, they play the Nationals tonight, and our schedule gets much harder after Toronto. Then again, Toronto hasn’t been easy. This is too much of a callback to the Angels series and the A’s series. Why are we playing all these allegedly crummy American League teams if we can’t take at least two out of three from all of them?

Who’s up to start the top of the ninth, anyway? Yeah, like that’s gonna matter.

Spoiler alert: It did matter.

Thanks for Calling

“Welcome back to Mets Talk. Caller, you’re on.”

“Yeah, hi. The Mets have to do better than they did Tuesday night in Toronto.”
“You’re absolutely right. Thanks for calling. Our next caller…”

“Um, yeah, long-time listener, first-time caller.”
“Great. What would you like to talk about?”
“I’m really sorry the Mets lost, 6-2, to the Blue Jays.”
“Me, too. Thanks for calling. Next caller, whatcha got?”

“Yeah, David Peterson has to do better than he did last night.”
“He sure does. Been doing great of late, not so much most recently. Hopefully he gets back on the horse. Thanks for calling. Our next caller…”

“Hi, listen, Tylor Megill, who hasn’t been that good when he’s gotten his chances, was terrific Monday, but Peterson, who’s been so good, wasn’t the next night.”
“Funny how that goes. Thanks for calling. We’re talking calls. Here’s our next one.”

“Carlos Mendoza shook up the batting order a little bit, but it didn’t really work. Can you remember the last time the Mets got a big hit?”
“Certainly before they had two guys named Alvarez in the lineup. Thanks for the question. Next caller, you’re on.”

“Hi, I’m a big Mets fan and I have to say I’m disappointed at how they didn’t hit Chris Bassitt.”
“Bassitt sure quieted the already quiet Met bats and disappointed more than a few Mets fans. Bassitt’s definitely done both before. Thanks for calling. We have another call.”

“How are the Mets supposed to win if they’re practically all gonna be in a slump at the same time?”
“That’s a great question with no easy answers. No doubt the front office and the dugout brain trust are working on concepts of a plan to get off the offensive schneid. Appreciate the call. You’re next.”

“Hey, the Braves won while the Mets lost, which means we’re tied for the last Wild Card spot again.”
“Thanks for the update. Next caller.”

“Hello. I was wondering if there was anything more to say about a lousy game and not so great outcome.”
“Nope. Thanks for calling. We’ll be right back.”

For Mets talk that’s likely to be a little more scintillating, join me at the Levittown Public Library Thursday afternoon at 3:30 for a discussion focused on the joys of baseball — rooting, writing and reading. More information is here.

Smooch the Ugly Ones Too

Baseball, I’ve long insisted, is humanity’s acme of artistic expression. But that’s not to say every game is a work of art.

Whatever that was that the Mets and Blue Jays foisted on us tonight would definitely not qualify. It was a mess, with Tylor Megill mowing down anonymous Blue Jay recruits (and a morose-looking Vladimir Guerrero Jr.) like a combine but then inexplicably leaving with 88 pitches on his odometer and a 1-0 lead. I dislike second guesses, but that counts as a first guess — Gary and Keith were wondering why Megill was taken out, as was I, as was you, as was everybody.

The decision immediately imploded as the Mets got a run of bad relief pitching: After recording an out Danny Young hit a guy and gave up a single, which led Carlos Mendoza to signal for Jose Butto. Recently Butto’s looked like he’s auditioning to return to starting, needing time to fine-tune his control regardless of whether or not time is available for him to do that. Butto fell behind and gave up a hit, leading to a mound visit in which Francisco Alvarez gave him the Full Lasorda, a mix of exhortation and can-do and stern warnings. It was an impressive Come to Jesus moment from a young catcher, but it also didn’t work: Butto hit the next guy to tie the game, then yielded a sacrifice fly to put the Mets behind.

(So of course he got the win. For the 845,093rd time, it’s an unfair game.)

(Edit: The above was based on SNY’s postgame screen, which was a placeholder; in fact the below-mentioned Ryne Stanek got the win, and properly so. Reset the Unfair Game counter to 845,092.)

The Blue Jays gagged up a game on Sunday against the Braves; tonight, wearing City Connects best described as Marlins North, they demonstrated admirable even-handedness in gagging up a game against us. I’ll leave the details smudgy to avoid further embarrassment for all involved, noting simply that the Mets got two runs on one hit, and the one hit was an oopsie cue-shot infield single. The rest was a slapstick farce of walks and errors and wild pitches and passed balls, best witnessed through the holes of a bag over one’s head regardless of your rooting interests. The winning run was scored by pinch-runner and former speed-skating medalist Eddy Alvarez, who replaced Pedro Reyes, whose own lone appearance also came as a pinch-runner. Should some waiver-wire guy named Delgado or Beltran wind up as a Met in the next few days, I’d advise them to rent and not buy.

Anyway, Ryne Stanek worked a blessedly blame-free eighth and Edwin Diaz came in for the ninth. Diaz’s final pitch was a fastball that Leo Jimenez whacked to right for what looked like a crushing walkoff homer, or at least it looked like that for 90% of its flight, until the ball’s momentum sagged and it came down in Starling Marte‘s glove in front of the fence. The Mets celebrated with the dazed smiles of a tour group that just exited a van that’s screeched to a stop inches from a ravine: Well, that’s a story to tell the grandkids!

Still, the ugly ones count just as much as the pretty ones, and right now each and every win is to be cherished and fussed over and smooched like a beauty-pageant winner arrived to take you for a spa weekend. Hello, aren’t you lovely and wasn’t that a delight? Smooch smooch smooch.

* * *

We’ve lost our fourth ’69 Met of the year with the death of Forever Met Ed Kranepool. Read Greg’s tribute — from our 2020 A Met for All Seasons series — here.

For Eddie

Ed Kranepool has passed away at the age of 79, though I don’t see how that’s possible. I’ve always considered Eddie Kranepool the closest thing there was to immortal our world. He was with us from just about the very beginning, and, as far as I was concerned, he was going to be around forever. I guess he will be, in our Met hearts and Met minds. I brought up his name on a podcast last week. I brought him up to my companion at the game yesterday. This is par for the Krane course. Nobody who rooted for the Mets from 1962 to 1979 will forget the high school phenom, the bonus baby; the young comer; the struggling major leaguer; the world champion platoon first baseman; the personification of professional renaissance; or the pinch-hitter deluxe. Every ring around the Mets’ tree had his signature carved within. Stopping playing didn’t erase the spot he held in our consciousness. I have a feeling it will grow only stronger.

From our 2020 series “A Met for All Seasons,” it is my privilege to share with you the last article we posted. Fittingly, Ed was our finale (representing 1979), because when it comes to a Met and all seasons, who the hell could possibly have followed Eddie Kranepool?

***

I’ve been alive forever
And I wrote the very first song

—Barry Manilow

Jeurys Familia (2012-2018, 2019- ) won’t still be relieving for the Mets in 2029. Jacob deGrom (2014- ) won’t still be starting for the Mets in 2031. Michael Conforto (2015- ) won’t still be driving in runs for the Mets in 2032. Brandon Nimmo (2016- ) won’t still be getting on base by any means necessary for the Mets in 2033. Dom Smith (2017- ) won’t still be pounding out doubles for the Mets in 2034. Jeff McNeil (2018- ) won’t still be pinging from position to position for the Mets in 2035. Pete Alonso (2019- ) won’t still be blasting homers for the Mets in 2036. Andrés Giménez (2020- ) won’t still be making plays in the hole for the Mets in 2037.

And if they are, they won’t be doing whatever they’re still doing for another year besides.

Steadiest Eddie.

So let’s salute as unbreakable a Mets record as exists: Ed Kranepool’s 18 seasons as a Met, spanning 1962 to 1979. Nobody else has come close to playing so long for us, let alone playing so long for us and nobody else. It is highly unlikely anybody else will ever play more. Longevity. Continuity. Exclusivity. The combination is not to be underestimated, because the combination crafted by Kranepool has never been equaled.

• Cure David Wright (2004-2016, 2018) of his spinal stenosis and let him play his entire contract, through 2020, without pause. He might make the Hall of Fame, but he comes up a year short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• Fix the left elbow of John Franco (1990-2001, 2003-2004) without time away for Tommy John surgery and then keep him around instead of letting him slip off to Houston for his final innings. He comes up two years short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• Same for fantasy-version, never-leaves, therefore in theory never-gets-in-trouble so we never have reason to stop loving him Jose Reyes (2003-2011, 2016-2018). Uninterrupted Reyes comes up two years short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• What if Buddy Harrelson (1965-1977) never left instead of spending two years with Philly and one in Texas? Still not enough. When Buddy was coaching in 1982 and the Mets were suddenly short of infielders, there was some chatter that the 38-year-old former Gold Glover might have to be activated. Add that hypothetical to the other hypothetical and still nope. Harrelson comes up two years short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• Straighter and narrower paths for Darryl Strawberry (1983-1990) and Doc Gooden (1984-1994) that carry them respectively to the ends of their careers (1999 and 2000, respectively) in Flushing? Like Wright, each man still winds up a year short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• Maybe if Tom Seaver’s restoration in 1983, intended to eradicate that he was forced to abdicate following his initial 1967-1977 reign, isn’t botched in 1984, and he stays at Shea all the way to 1987, which was when he officially retired…that’s sixteen seasons as a Met and it’s also STILL not enough to measure up to Ed Kranepool as a Met.

And if you’re a New York Met who’s beyond the reach of even Tom Freakin’ Seaver, then, brother, you must be doin’ somethin’ Amazin’.

You can attempt to delete ifs and buts from the story of every Met who isn’t Eddie Kranepool, but they’ve all got ifs and buts. For example, if the Mets never traded Jerry Koosman, he conceivably could have played all nineteen of his seasons with the Mets (and maybe been A Met for All Seasons), but then we don’t get Jesse Orosco and we can’t say for sure who would’ve gotten the second last out of a World Series in Mets history.

No, no buts about Eddie Kranepool. No ifs, either. Ed Kranepool showed up early and stayed as late as he possibly could. He put in 18 seasons; 18 seasons in a row; and 18 seasons in a row as a Met only.

Edward Emil Kranepool in a taxi, honey.

Nobody’s had a Met career like Kranepool’s, except Kranepool. Nobody’s been a Met like Kranepool, except Kranepool. Nobody’s been the Mets like Kranepool, except Kranepool. That was the case in 1962, in 1979, in all the seasons in between and, as the four-plus decades since he played have illustrated, forever after. Projections are dangerous to make without the data to back it up, but I feel comfortable declaring nobody else ever will be a Met like Kranepool, except Kranepool.

That’s the beauty. That he’s still Ed Kranepool and there’s still no catching him or matching him let alone the possibility of hatching him, or a reasonable facsimile thereof. There’s exactly one Ed Kranepool. Nobody else has one of him because there is only one of him. Baseball-Reference lists “similarity scores” for every player with decently measurable major league tenure (100 IP; 500 AB), so while you can certainly find statistical comps for Ed Kranepool if so inclined, I don’t believe any other baseball franchise has so deeply embroidered within the fabric of their story any figure quite like him.

Ed Kranepool is of the New York Mets.
The New York Mets are of Ed Kranepool.
He’s ours, dammit.

***
Ed Kranepool, we have determined, has the Most Seasons record cold. Most games played, too, with 1,858, topping Wright by more than a full season-and-a-half’s worth. According to Baseball Musings, nobody’s played in more Met losses than Eddie: 1,102, which will come with the territory of anybody whose 18 Met seasons, partial and full, encompassed eight last-place finishes. Krane is second in wins, however, with 746 (with five ties thrown in for middling measure). Befitting a man of his experience, he dots Top Fives and Top Tens all over the Met charts.

He earned his spots in the upper levels of Mets compilation categories by hanging in there. It is no insult to say Ed Kranepool’s best quality as a player was sticking around and sticking around some more. That and arriving in the big leagues sooner than any Met ever had or ever will. The latter is technically unknowable, but give us a shout when you come across another Met not yet old enough to vote.

The Youth of America gets some private tutoring.

Eddie was only 17, no older than ABBA’s Dancing Queen, when he made his major league debut, which makes sense only when you realize the Mets weren’t yet six months old themselves and how is an infant franchise supposed to know you don’t put a 17-year-old in the big leagues unless it’s World War II or you’re nurturing the next Mel Ott? They signed Ed in late June shortly after his high school graduation and ten days after Marv Throneberry failed to touch two-thirds of the necessary bases to secure what he thought was a triple. So yeah, the baby Mets were in the market for a first baseman of the future practically right away. At James Monroe High School in the Bronx, Ed broke records established generations before by a fella named Hank Greenberg. He was a heavily scouted, hot enough property in those pre-draft days to elicit a bonus of $85,000, a lofty figure for 1962.

Ed chose the Mets because he deduced advancement on a ballclub in dire need of help would come quickly. Yet the Mets didn’t rush him to the majors right away. No, they waited until September. Then they give him just a taste. The fans, too. They needed something to savor en route to 40-120, something that would tell them the future had some promise in it. Kranepool relieved Gil Hodges on defense on September 22. He got his first base hit a day later in what was supposed to be the final game the Mets would ever play in the Polo Grounds. The following April, Shea Stadium wasn’t ready, so the Mets were back in Manhattan. So was Eddie, though he probably wasn’t ready, either. How could he be? He was only 18. A productive Spring Training had lured Casey Stengel into insisting on Krane’s inclusion on 1963’s Opening Day roster, but the minors beckoned by July.

In 1964, at 19, Eddie was an established big leaguer, though one seemingly final detour to Triple-A at least provided him a story to tell again and again (as if being schooled by Stengel while wet behind the ears wasn’t enough of a conversation piece). After slumping during Shea’s first weeks, he tore up Buffalo, earning a promotion in late May. He played in a doubleheader for the Bisons on a Saturday in Syracuse and schlepped to Queens for a doubleheader the next afternoon. That one, against the Giants, went 32 innings in toto, and Eddie played all of it. Had the May 31 nightcap lasted just a little longer, Krane likes to mention, he would have been playing in another month.

“When are we gonna be ready?”

The Mets’ youth movement was planting its seeds during Kranepool’s first years, and it was reasonable to assume he was on the verge of sprouting. In recent times, when prodigy Bryce Harper was breaking in to rave reviews, and later when Juan Soto was doing the same but even more spectacularly, their ascent up the ranks of the all-time teenager home run list was duly noted. You know whose name continued to show up prominently in such historical accountings? Yeah, Ed Kranepool’s. His 12 home runs before the age of 20 slot him eighth among all teens in baseball history. Admittedly, there’s not a ton of competition, given that relatively few players see the majors before their twenties, but among those who did, Eddie showed more power than most of them. Krane is one behind his boyhood idol Mickey Mantle, one ahead of Robin Yount. Mantle and Yount are in the Hall of Fame. (It only seems like Soto already is, too.)

Eddie was at least, after turning twenty the previous November, an All-Star in 1965. The Mets were on their way to losing more than a hundred games for the fourth consecutive season, so this was one of those situations in which there was a Met All-Star because the rules said there had to be, but Eddie was posting very respectable numbers, batting over .300 through mid-June and hitting .287 once he joined the likes of Mays, Aaron and Clemente at Metropolitan Stadium in Bloomington. Ed didn’t play, as the NL won without his contributions, but they certainly didn’t ask him to vacate the premises.

It would be misleading to play the AMFAS Young Player Peaked™ card here, because it’s hard to say a good first half in ’65 and a little pop while still getting proofed if he requested a Rheingold amounted to a peak. There were some good signs for Kranepool, but what Ol’ Case had said in the first part of his famous “in ten years…” line wasn’t quite coming to fruition. You know the bit. Stengel, in what turned out to be his final Spring Training as skipper, was telling reporters about two representatives of his Youth of America. This young feller, he more or less said of Ed Kranepool, is twenty, and in ten years has a chance to be a star. This other young feller, he said of Greg Goossen, is twenty, and in ten years has a chance to be thirty.

The joke is usually on Goossen, and perhaps Stengel, but Kranepool, at twenty, was done being an All-Star. His final 1965 numbers sagged. Once he stopped being a teenager, his home run totals ceased to appear impressive. Once he turned 21, he’d never again play in as many as 150 games in a season. Once he turned 23, he’d never again play in as many as 130 games in a season. It was somewhere around this time that the realization set in that the first amateur the Mets ever signed to much fanfare was never going to set the world on fire as a professional the way scouts thought he might when he was in high school just a few years earlier.

Or as the banner a not particularly satisfied customer brandished not very deep into the young man’s career asked, “IS ED KRANEPOOL OVER THE HILL?”

Ed Kranepool got old before his time, but only in context. When the Mets traded Jim Hickman to the Dodgers following the 1966 season, that left Ed as the only player from 1962 on the club. Those who weren’t particular about specifics would, for the rest of his Met days, refer to him as the last of the Original Mets. It was a misnomer. The Original Mets were the 28 men who broke camp in April. They included Hickman, Hodges and the first/righty Bob Miller. Legend notwithstanding, Marvelous Marv was not an Original Met. Nor were Choo Choo Coleman, the second/lefty Bob Miller or Harry Chiti, who was traded for himself. Eddie was the 45th of 45 men to play as a 1962 Met. In the popular imagination, they’re all lumped together as the lovable losers of legend. Ed played in two defeats and just three games overall that first year. There’d be plenty of losses to which he’d serve as accomplice in ’63 (starting with Opening Day, when Stengel assigned him to right field), but pinning the L of the first year on Kranepool’s forehead isn’t wholly accurate or remotely fair.

But, like with the doubleheader for Buffalo the day before the doubleheader at Shea before May turned to June, it made for a better story to point to Eddie as someone who’d been around forever. Hence, the 1967 yearbook referred to the 22-year-old as “The Dean”. It was funny because it was true. Ed was the only Met who’d been around since at least the end of the beginning. By ’67, with Ron Hunt having departed in the same trade that dispatched Hickman, he was also the only Met left from when Shea was brand, spanking new. Kranepool was only nine days older than Seaver, yet had a five-season and better than a 500-game head start on the good-looking rookie righty who would turn heads like no Met before him. Casey had given way to Wes Westrum. Stengel’s Youth of America had only taken hold in fits and starts. Seaver was the harbinger of the next era. It wasn’t quite in Queens in ’67, but if Seaver was here, it couldn’t be far off.

Kranepool was here, too. He kind of came with the place.

***
Growing up, I never thought of Ed Kranepool as a bad player. I never thought of Ed Kranepool as a good player. I just thought Ed Kranepool was a Met. I had never known the Mets without him. Unless you latched onto the Mets when they debuted on April 11, 1962, and then walked away in disgust before June was over (“how could Throneberry miss first AND second?”), nobody had ever experienced the Mets without Ed on their radar if not in their box score. My first exposure to Eddie was on a Topps 1967 baseball card, one of the I don’t know how many dozens that fell into my possession once my sister tired of accumulating them. He’s kneeling in what’s supposed to be an on-deck circle, except it doesn’t appear to be marked as such. He’s just kneeling, somewhere on grass in St. Petersburg. Not that I understood the niceties of baseball card photography when I first got a look at ED KRANEPOOL • 1B or had any conception how long he had been around relative to his teammates or his franchise when I first got my hands on it. I just knew the METS, as the pink-purple lettering identified his employer, were my local team, so I probably wanted to mark this card as special.

This is the version without the beard.

At four, maybe five years old, I took a blue Bic pen and drew a beard on Ed Kranepool’s face. I didn’t do that to anybody on any other card from any other team or, come to think of it, any other Met. Maybe I felt an instinctive connection to the Met who’d outlasted all of his previous peers to date. Maybe I was just in the mood to draw a beard on a face. Either way, I can’t recall further evidence of personal affinity for Ed Kranepool. Like I said, he kind of came with the place, simply a fact of Met life, like Shea Stadium, or Kiner’s Korner, or rallies that fell a run short in the ninth.

Gil Hodges must have thought something similar. The kid he said goodbye to in May of 1963 when he retired from playing to take up managing in Washington was still a Met five years later when Gil returned to take the Flushing reins. Lord knows the reins needed him. The Mets had never lost fewer than 95 games, never finished higher than ninth out of ten, and they only reached that height once. By the time Gil came back, Ed “had been around long enough,” Leonard Koppett wrote, “to be seen as disappointing, not the pure promise [he] had been.”

Did Gil Hodges need Ed Kranepool? He didn’t lean on The Dean nearly as much as Stengel and Westrum had, starting him less in 1968 than his predecessors had every year since 1964. It’s no coincidence that Hodges elevated the Mets to a point where they won more often and didn’t fret about losing their lovability. Their standing didn’t exceed ninth, but all contemporary observations agree that this ninth was light years removed from the tenths of yore. The losses (89) continued to outweigh the wins (73), but the chronic ineptitude that took root in ’62 was being professionally removed. Some of that lingering Youth of America was indeed in bloom, but it’s also universally agreed that it was the tending Hodges did that accelerated the growth.

It’s probably a coincidence that the reduction in Kranepool’s playing time occurred in the first season that suggested the Mets were capable of truly getting their act together. Ed’s production tumbled in 1968, even taking into consideration that this was The Year of the Pitcher. Under Hodges, playing time would have to be earned by all Mets, with bonus-baby pedigree serving as no kind of determining factor.

***
Ed Kranepool was batting .227 entering play on July 8, 1969, and was mired in a 5-for-53 slump. Nonetheless, Gil Hodges started him and batted him sixth that afternoon against one of the best righthanders in the National League, Ferguson Jenkins. It was, to that moment, the biggest game the Mets were ever scheduled to play in their eight-season existence, really the first big game they’d ever played. The first three months of the season had been a revelation. Instead of falling through the floor, they rose in the standings and, with the halfway mark at hand, they were in second place, seriously challenging the NL East-leading Chicago Cubs for first. The difference between the two teams was five games, unless you counted perceptions. The Cubs were star-laden successors to the Cardinals as smart-money favorites to breeze away with the pennant.

The Mets, no matter that they were well over .500 and actually looking down on multiple teams rather than peering up at everybody, were still the Mets. C’mon, let’s get serious.

That was a challenge the Mets were up for. Their fans, too, 55,096 of whom came to play on a day like no other at Shea. They were stoked to root the Mets over the Cubs as loud as they could. They loved these guys who were blowing by mere respectability and indeed getting serious about first place.

One guy, though, would have to earn it a little more than the others.

At 1:58 PM, according to the tick-tock chronicled in The Year the Mets Lost Last Place, “Jack Lightcap, the Met announcer delivers the starting lineups over the public address system. The crowd greets every Met name with wild cheers, every name except that of the starting first baseman, Ed Kranepool.”

Ed was the Met around whom the Mets as a whole had been chronologically built. His growing pains ensued in full view of those who loved their team but hated that they were so terribly lousy. The sour residue of those years had centered itself on one of 25 Mets in a year when every Met name should have been greeted with wild cheers. “Kranepool,” Dick Schaap and Paul Zimmerman posited, “was young only in chronology, not in manner. He ran like an eighty-year-old man catching a commuter train. His modest ability to hit became even more modest with men on base.”

Krane’s start in ’69 had been good for a while, though this, too, was to form, according to the authors. “[E]very now and then,” they wrote, “Kranepool showed flashes of the brilliance that had been expected of him. For a few weeks, usually at the start of the season, he would hit over .300, and Met fans, starved for a hero, would rally to him. But then Kranepool would start slipping toward his own level […] and the fans would abandon him.” On June 15, with Eddie’s latest seemingly inevitable slump beginning to gather downhill steam, GM Johnny Murphy traded for another first baseman, veteran Donn Clendenon. Clendenon, a righty, settled into a platoon with Kranepool, a lefty. In the week prior to the Cub series, Donn had driven in eleven runs. Donn was linked only to these good new days. Ed went back to what he himself referred to as “a seven-year losing streak”.

Prepare to dine like a champ.

No wonder, then, that if Mets fans had to not respond positively to any Met, perhaps as an exercise in figuratively pinching themselves that everything couldn’t possibly going so well, they had their object of derision all picked out. Eight Mets in July 8’s starting lineup are celebrated as soon as Lightcap announces them. “Kranepool’s name,” Schaap and Zimmerman noted, “inspires a chorus of boos.”

But that was before the game, before the fifth, when, with no runs on the board, Kranepool swung and sent a Jenkins slider over the right field wall. Nobody was booing now. And by the ninth, when the Mets were rallying from a 3-1 deficit, there was no time for ancient recriminations. Everything is happening in the now. Ken Boswell leads off with a fly ball Cubs center fielder Don Young can’t find. It lands as a double. With one out, Clendenon comes off the bench to pinch-hit, the beauty of having two capable first basemen on the roster. He hits one very deep to left-center. Young tracks it down but can’t hold it. It’s another double, though because it took its time not being caught, Boswell has to advance with caution, and he runs only to third.

That’s OK, because Cleon Jones, way up in the batting race, hits one to deep left to score both Ken and Donn. Cleon, a .352 hitter, lands at second. It’s the Mets’ third double of the inning. It’s 1969, and in 1969, managers like Leo Durocher stick with aces like Ferguson Jenkins. Durocher instructs Jenkins to intentionally walk Art Shamsky. The strategy works provisionally as Wayne Garrett grounds to second, leaving runners on second and third for the next batter.

The next batter is Ed Kranepool. Durocher can have him walked, too, so Jenkins can face J.C. Martin. But, are you kidding? Leo’s not worried about any Ed Kranepool.

Maybe he should’ve been, because Eddie makes contact with a one-and-two pitch and bloops it into left field. It falls in for a single. Jones dashes home. The Mets have won, 4-3. The Mets have picked up ground on the Cubs. The Mets are serious contenders. The fans are jubilant, and Eddie has made them so. Ed Kranepool is now batting .232, and he’s going to wind up 1969 batting only .238, but he’s quite clearly having the best season of his life. “I used to get so tired of losing,” he said. “It made the days so long and the nights so unpleasant.”

These were better days. The best two, from a Krane’s perspective, came on October 14, when the Met who’d seen it all since 1962 hit a home run in the World Series, and October 16, when the team he’d played for since 1962 won the World Series. Clendenon, Series MVP, and Kranepool combined for four dingers in the five games.

***
For the rest of Ed Kranepool’s life, he was a 1969 Met, with a 1969 World Series ring, hard-earned and hard-won. In every public reunion of the world champs, Ed would be as front and center as any of them. The “…since 1962” part was trivia now. The trials and tribulations of a bonus baby who didn’t live up to the hype, who was labeled intermittently as “bitter” or “lazy” was dusty backstory. Eddie beat the Cubs. Eddie beat the Orioles. Eddie, along with his teammates who sung about it on The Ed Sullivan Show, had heart.

Ed Kranepool was now a world champion — a 1969 World Champion New York Met. Nobody could take that away from him. The journey from the basement to the penthouse was complete. With the possible exception of Ed Charles, whose professional baseball career commenced in 1952; was stymied for a decade by institutional racism; and then got bogged down by colorless losing in Kansas City, nobody in a Mets uniform could have appreciated this new reality more than the Krane.

Except the Glider really could call his journey complete. His career ended with Game Five of the World Series (whether he wanted it to or not was another matter). Charles was 36. Kranepool was 24. Though he’d worked as a stockbroker in the offseason and might have thrived in business had he followed that path, he was a ballplayer first and foremost. He had a lot more ball to play.

After 1969, it couldn’t help but be kind of a downer to have to live up to what he’d just been a part of. It showed, not only in his performance but his demeanor. For all the youth he’d embodied, Ed never evinced a sense of ebullience. Maybe he didn’t feel a reason to. He never knew his father, who’d been killed in World War II. He’d been pushed to compete in the top tier of baseball before he was ready. The fans were preternaturally impatient. The reporters always had questions (and occasionally had digs). The manager expected improvement, championship ring or not.

For a spell in 1970, Ed Kranepool went to a place he’d rightfully assumed he was done with, save for annual exhibitions. He was sent to the minors. The erstwhile All-Star, the man who belted a home run in the previous October’s World Series, was batting .118. He was also 25. Not old. Not baseball old, even. It wouldn’t have seemed all that strange if all you knew was age and average and didn’t know the name and what he’d done last summer and fall.

But this was Ed Kranepool, who’d been a Met since 1962 and hadn’t been a minor leaguer since 1964. It was a shock to the system, both that of Mets fans and The Dean. Ed went to Tidewater, hit .310 and returned. The Mets hadn’t thrived in his absence, failing to defend their championship, but Ed was better in the long haul for his visit to Triple-A. Starting in 1971, Ed wasn’t just a young veteran ballplayer, but a reliable young veteran ballplayer. The average soared to .280. The OPS+, for the first time in his career, rose above 100, indicating he was more than a replacement-level player. Not that anybody had that stat handy in ’71, but he’d transitioned to the latter half of his career in style. Gil Hodges’s expectations were being met.

Ed’s speed demanded In Action cards portray him standing his ground.

Alas, Gil would be gone before Opening Day 1972, a victim of a fatal heart attack. It was a blow to the entire organization. Nobody likely felt it any more than his fellow first baseman from 1962, the youngster the manager had pushed to mature. “He learned to respect me,” Ed reflected to his SABR biographer Tara Krieger in 2008, “and I learned to respect him.”

The Mets’ next manager, Yogi Berra, who also had played briefly with Kranepool, was a mellower figure. He inherited a club whose offense was bolstered heading into ’72, with trades for Jim Fregosi and Rusty Staub. One of those swaps worked out better than the others — and they were supplemented by another deal for Ed’s former All-Star teammate Willie Mays — but the season, like the two seasons preceding it, were no better than 83-win wonders. They were good enough for third place, which after 1969 wasn’t very good at all.

Then came 1973, and a division captured on 82 wins (maybe that had been the problem from ’70 through ’72 — the Mets were winning one game too many). Eddie was a decidedly part-time player as he reached his late twenties. Clendenon had moved on, but John Milner’s power eventually made him the first baseman more days than not. With the Hammer supplanting the Krane, Ed took more reps in the outfield than he had at any time in a decade. It paid off in the fifth and final game of the NLCS. Staub was out with a sore shoulder, so Berra had to improvise. Eddie started in left, with Cleon in right. Kranepool drove in the Mets’ first two runs in the first, then took a seat so Mays could pinch-hit and drive in another in the fifth. Four innings after that, the Mets had their and Eddie’s second pennant.

***
The Mets didn’t win the World Series in 1973, and Ed Kranepool never got close to another postseason once Oakland beat New York in seven games. His legacy, however, was about to be embellished. For Mets fans coming of rooting age in the middle and late ’70s, stories of Kranepool’s shortcomings sounded as if they’d been excavated from the ruins of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. It may have happened, but we didn’t really understand. Eddie Kranepool, to us, wasn’t a bonus baby who never delivered on his promise. He was ED-DEE Kranepool who delivered big-time when called upon, two syllables at a time.

A Mets fan’s view of Ed Kranepool really depended on when one tuned into his long-running show. Getting hooked on the Mets by 1974 got you the Eddie you couldn’t fathom was once considered unpopular. To those of us who were too young to have grasped the 1960s in real time, this Eddie Kranepool, who arose in the wake of his roommate Tug McGraw’s cry of YOU GOTTA BELIEVE, even overshadows the Eddie Kranepool who shows off his 1969 World Series ring. In the 1960s, I was drawing beards on his baseball card. In the 1970s, I was wrapping rubber bands around my Ed Kranepools and storing them safely in a shoe box. I even had him on my closet door — not a card, but an autographed photo. Ed had come to my sixth-grade class one day when I was absent to hand them out. I don’t know how I always managed to be absent for the cool shit, but I was. The story I was told the next day was our teacher was friends with him, so why wouldn’t Ed Kranepool visit Lindell School without notice? Miss Goldstein was kind enough to put aside a picture for me, writing “Greg” on the border. It was almost like it was personalized.

How was I absent for this?

While this was an out-of-the-ordinary occurrence, somehow I wasn’t that surprised that Ed Kranepool would visit a random classroom on a random weekday sans warning. Ed and Ron Swoboda had run a restaurant on Long Island. He lived here year-round. Getting the opportunity to meet Ed Kranepool (unless you were dumb enough to be out with a cold or something) seemed to come with the territory, like what Wayne Campbell said on Wayne’s World about Fleetwood Mac’s Rumours. A copy of the album was issued to every kid in the suburbs.

Eddie, I’m sure, got a nice hand from a roomful of kids. How nice, I couldn’t say. He was beloved without exactly being lovable, though one must concede love is a matter of taste. Drop by Kranepool’s Ultimate Mets Database fan memories page and you’ll be overwhelmed by how many of the Metsian persuasion pledge eternal allegiance to Eddie — and be more than a little taken aback by those who would be fine if a sinkhole opened up and swallowed him.

Ah, Mets fans.

Generally, familiarity bred affection. Getting really good at something didn’t hurt, either. Ed Kranepool’s 18 seasons yielded 4.3 wins above replacement, per Baseball-Reference. That’s negligible, marginal, insignificant if you didn’t put the number to the name. But the name was Ed Kranepool, and had we known about WAR then, we wouldn’t have cared, because there was one thing Ed Kranepool was, in fact, really good at. Besides sticking around, I mean.

Ed Kranepool became the world’s greatest pinch-hitter this side of Manny Mota. From 1974 to 1977, he batted .447 (42-for-94) in the role that suited him to a tee. In his first pinch-hitting appearance of 1978, he homered off Stan Bahnsen of the Expos to win the game, the first and only walkoff home run of his career. Sometimes he was so good at pinch-hitting, his managers got carried away and pushed him off the bench and into the starting lineup. It was the bench’s loss. For a couple of years, he was pretty close to a regular again and better than ever at it. In his early thirties, he was an approximation of what he was supposed to have been all along. In 1976, he pinch-hit only ten times because Joe Frazier started him more than 100 games, the most votes of confidence Ed had received since Hodges began to fully “respect” him in 1971. In 1975, Ed hit .323 after making Metsopotamia rub its eyes in disbelief by lifting his average above .400 in early June. There was talk of a write-in campaign to make him an All-Star for a second time (it didn’t get anywhere). Poet Bob McKenty was so inspired by the Krane’s surge that he channeled his amazement in verse for the Times:

Although his bat knows no fatigue,
Eddie Kranepool is unique:
The only man in either league
To bat .400 twice a week.

Throughout this second or third phase of his renaissance, Ed Kranepool wore an expression of a man just getting comfortable with being accepted for who he is. The residual gawkiness of the teen and preternatural grumpiness of the dismissed was still in evidence, but this was the Krane. The bird with whom he was homophonically linked is described as large, long-legged and an opportunistic feeder. Some are said to not migrate at all and keep to themselves.

The Krane was indeed a rare bird, native to the meadows of Flushing.

Sounds about right. As Leonard Koppett reflected as the flight of the Krane entered what turned out to be its loftiest elevation in 1974, “He didn’t appreciate being the butt of all those jokes in the early days, felt that he hadn’t been given as many opportunities to play regularly as he had earned. He didn’t hold grudges, and he appreciated his responsibilities in a public relations sense, but he was not what one would call a warm personality.”

Nevertheless, Ed Kranepool is who we got as Mets fans, and who we as Mets fans got, even if Ed Kranepool didn’t always seemed thrilled to be Ed Kranepool. He’d smile for the camera if the situation demanded it, but otherwise seemed a little shall we say circumspect about the whole thing — Joe Pesci’s description of the white-haired gent in his mother’s painting in Goodfellas comes to mind: “And this guy’s saying, ‘whaddaya want from me?’”

It’s worth remembering that when a pennant wasn’t being chased, Eddie was essentially just another guy going to work in the same job he had for a long time back when most ballplayers weren’t compensated lavishly and weren’t above replacement. He often seemed unhappy with his situation, maybe with his co-workers, surely with his employers. You stay in the same job for 18 years and not sound surly now and then. Except nobody with a notepad or microphone is likely to ask you what you’re thinking at the end of a bad day or unsatisfying year.

Yet he seemed to smile for the cameras a little more as the years went by. He starred in his very own Gillette Foamy commercial, implicitly attributing the upturn in his fortunes since 1971 not to extra swings in the cage but the shaving cream he was enthusiastically apportioning across his face. When Newsday carriers were encouraged, in the summer of 1977, to convince more of their neighbors to sign up as subscribers, the bait the paper offered us to hustle and sell was a ticket to see the Mets one night real soon, specifically “Mets stars Henderson and Kranepool”. Henderson was the new kid, Steve, from Cincinnati. We all knew Kranepool. We might not have thought of him as a star, but with Seaver and Kingman traded, and Koosman and Matlack struggling, we got it.

I never did sign up any new subscribers (other than my parents), but I would have taken a ticket to Newsday Night at Shea Stadium to see Ed Kranepool. Starting, pinch-hitting, shaving…didn’t matter. ED-DEE could do it all.

***
On December 8, 1978, the Mets traded Jerry Koosman to Minnesota for minor league pitcher Greg Field and a player to be named later, leaving only one 1969 Met to be a 1979 Met. Ed Kranepool got to Shea before every one of his world champion teammates and he outlasted them, too. The Dean had extended his tenure to a record-breaking 18th season. He was The Fantasticks, running Off-Broadway since the early ’60s, with no closing date in sight. His peers had been Throneberry and Coleman and the two Bob Millers at the beginning, then the men who made a couple of miracles. Now he was part of a unit whose headliners were named Mazzilli, Stearns, Swan and the darling of the Newsday carrier set, Henderson. Every Met who’d been on an active roster from late September 1962 to late September 1979 had something in common: they had all been Ed Kranepool’s workplace proximity acquaintances. There were close to 300 men who qualified, almost everybody who’d ever been a Met.

That didn’t include Harry Chiti. He’d been traded for himself before Ed got called up.

One of the best ever in a pinch.

The late-career magic Kranepool’s bat packed began to wear off in ’78, by which time the long days and unpleasant nights of losing were again entrenched at Shea. The newest iteration of the Youth of America was given the bulk of the playing time by Joe Torre. First baseman Willie Montañez was an RBI machine, so starting the Krane to to keep him sharp became impractical. Ed’s pinch-hitting could still be lethal (15-for-50) but his rare opportunities in the lineup went for naught (2-for-30). Keeping a 33-year-old part-timer fresh was hardly Torre’s priority. When Ed came up in 1962, there was nobody as young as Kranepool. When he headed into 1979, there was nobody in the clubhouse who could possibly relate to all of his baseball life experiences. The 18-year-veteran appeared to be, in the immortal customer-service advice of Rodney Dangerfield, all alone here.

Except on July 14, the highlight of the 63-99 1979 season in a campaign almost entirely devoid of them. It was Old Timers Day at Shea Stadium. The festivities centered on the tenth anniversary of the 1969 Mets. The bulk of them were retired from baseball already. The handful who weren’t were playing for other teams. Seaver was a Red, Koosman a Twin, Nolan Ryan still an Angel long after the Fregosi trade proved less than optimal. Most of those who no longer had a ballgame to play every Saturday showed up at Shea.

One 1969 Met didn’t have to make a special trip. For one afternoon, during pregame ceremonies, Ed Kranepool didn’t have to be a 1979 Met. He could line up with the Mets with whom he identified most closely. He could even break out into a grin when joined in the introductions by perhaps the most famous ’69er of the moment, Chico Escuela, a.k.a. Garrett Morris. Morris had broken through with his “baseball been berry, berry good to me” catchphrase on Saturday Night Live months before. It was uncommonly hip of the 1979 Mets to invite him to reprise his role — that of a 1969 Mets utility infielder — among the authentic alumni. Ed had already gone along with the joke enough to appear in a filmed bit on Weekend Update in which Kranepool had to express dismay with Chico’s new tell-all book, Bad Stuff ’Bout the Mets. Ed was a natural at expressing dismay.

Tom Seaver: “Always take up two parking places.”

Yogi Berra: “Berry, berry bad card player.”

Ed Kranepool: “Borrow Chico’s soap and never give it back.”

Ed stayed in character and shook his head that Chico was stabbing the guys in the back with his revelations. What the hell, it wasn’t like the 1979 Mets were doing any kind of a 1969 impression.

***
When the old champs scattered to their post-baseball lives and Ed Kranepool was left to continue in his long-running role, it had to be acknowledged that Eddie hadn’t only been the last of the Met-hicans from 1969 to stay at Shea, he was having a pretty damn long major league career. Those guys who tipped their mesh caps as old-timers in July (the Mets were so cheap in those days) were more or less the same age as Ed. Yet most of them were done. Ed got better at baseball as he went along. True, he was in the denouement phase of his ED-DEE peak by 1979, destined to bat only .232 in his final season, but you didn’t see Jones or Agee or Swoboda or Shamsky still being asked to pinch-hit at a ballpark near you. We’ll say it again: Eddie knew how to stick around.

Except for one night in August when, against the Astros, he left the field before the game was over. To be fair, he thought the game was over. See, the Mets were leading the Astros, 5-0, and starter Pete Falcone had induced Jeffrey Leonard to fly to center with two out in the ninth, so that seemed to end it. Except Frank Taveras had called time at short, which meant Leonard got to swing again, and he used it to single…except this time it was noticed the Mets didn’t have their full complement of nine at their positions because Kranepool, figuring the game was already in the books, had vamoosed to the clubhouse, and…well, let’s just say you don’t come up with the 1962 Mets without somewhere in your soul still being a 1962 Met. The bottom line was an Astro protest was upheld and they had to finish the game the next afternoon (no harm done, except to Falcone’s complete game).

In 1979, an 18-year feast of base hits and dependability was about to end.

It would be too much to read into one confusing episode and infer Eddie was trying to tell us, “Hello, I must be going.” Nevertheless, on September 30, 1979, anybody who was watching or listening to the Mets and Cards from St. Louis was about to witness something that seemed unimaginable across the history of the Metropolitan Baseball Club of New York.

It was Ed Kranepool’s last game. Torre sent him up to pinch-hit for John Pacella in the seventh. Eddie produced a double, his 1,418th base hit, which remained the Met standard until David Wright passed him in 2012, and his 90th career pinch-hit, still a franchise record (and 31st all-time in the major leagues). The manager just as quickly removed him for pinch-runner Gil Flores.

That was it. The Ed Kranepool Era was over.

Well, the part where he played for the Mets, that is. When you’re talking Mets, I don’t think the Ed Kranepool Era ever ends.

***
Ed Kranepool’s three-year contract expired after the 1979 season. Management was not interested in negotiating a new one. Maybe Ed could have shopped his services to the American League, where the designated hitter was embraced rather than scorned. A man over 35 could get regular swings over there without having to worry about playing the sport the way it’s designed. But the Krane was definitely not a migratory bird. He’d lived all his life in New York, whether it was the Bronx or on Long Island. Free agency opportunities notwithstanding, he wasn’t about to take flight.

Kranepool knew, as everybody did, that the Mets were going to be sold. They were scraping bottom in the standings and drawing ants (flies couldn’t be bothered), but they were still, on paper, a National League jewel in the largest market baseball had. Maybe a new GM would be interested in Kranepool. Better yet, maybe Kranepool could be in on hiring the new GM. Eddie, whose business acumen was a bigger part of skill set than foot speed, tried to put a group together. He was serious. It made the papers. But, ultimately, the group led by Nelson Doubleday and Fred Wilpon bought the Mets. Ed Kranepool didn’t. In 1980, for the first time since there’d been Mets, a Mets season would proceed without Ed Kranepool in uniform.

When the 2020 season was on hold and I had no new games to watch, I checked YouTube to see if anybody had uploaded episodes of my favorite TV drama from when Ed Kranepool was winding down as a player. To my delight, somebody had. The entire series of Lou Grant, which initially ran from 1977 to 1982, was available for my viewing, and I viewed the hell out of it, all 120 episodes. I mention this because a recurring baseball player character was introduced as a love interest for reporter Billie Newman during Season Three, a backup catcher named Ted McCovey, no relation to Willie. Ted isn’t old for a regular person, but he’s not a regular person. He’s a ballplayer and he’s just been placed on irrevocable waivers. Ted tries to explain to Billie what this all means:

You know what baseball’s done for me? Treated me like a kid for the past fourteen years, and now, suddenly, they’re telling me I’m an old man.

I don’t get the sense that’s something Ed Kranepool would have said when the Mets told him his services were no longer required, but I have to imagine he thought some unscripted unsentimental version of it. Ed was their golden boy. He grew up with them. He’d literally spent half his life answering to chants of ED-DEE, maybe tuning out the less flattering remarks that came with it. When Ed Kranepool played his last game, he was fewer than six weeks shy of 35. Not old for a regular person. Not close to old. Not even the oldest Met of his final season (Jose Cardenal was almost 36).

But too old to play for the Mets anymore, which must have been very strange.

***
About as great an Internet find as Lou Grant for me was a reprint of a magazine article from the defunct New York Sports, which lives on in pixels thanks to our friends at Metsmerized Online. It’s an article from 1984, breathed back to life by MMO in 2012, written by Len Albin. It’s called “Ed Kranepool Never Got a Day”. At the time, Ed was feeling underappreciated by Mets management not so many years after he hung up his spikes. His 1,858 games, his 1,418 hits, his 18 seasons cut little ice with an ownership more concerned with trying to make people forget the recent past than celebrating more distant glories. These Mets were just getting good at being in the present. It might have been too much to demand their executives pay proper homage to the past.

Yeah, but this was Ed Kranepool, No. 7 from 1965 forward (and No. 21 for a couple of years before that). This was Ed Kranepool when David Wright was a toddler, Eddie’s records not close to being threatened. They hadn’t given him anything approaching what he — or anybody who’d been a Mets fan more than five minutes — considered his due. No ceremony, no acknowledgement, no nothin’.

“I don’t feel an allegiance to the Mets anymore,” Kranepool told Albin, even as he dressed up in his c. 1978 uniform top and posed Lou Gehrig-style in an empty Shea, addressing the fans who weren’t there for the day he had yet to get. “Loyalty went out the window the day they didn’t sign me.”

Did Eddie mean it? Probably. And probably not. And were the Mets that blithe toward the man who as much as anybody epitomized who they’d been for almost their first two decades? Probably. But probably not. The Mets still had enough of a rearview mirror to gather Old Timers annually in the ’80s. Under Frank Cashen, they inaugurated a Hall of Fame in 1981. True, they hid the commemorative busts in the lobby to the Diamond Club where few were bound to bump into them, and they tended to not announce the ceremonies with sufficient advance notice to draw a large crowd, but they were, in their own less than fantastic way, trying to remember the kinds of Septembers like 1969 and 1973…even a little 1962 sometimes, if not any 1979.

On September 1, 1990, before the Mets took on the Giants in front of more than 40,000 fans, Ed Kranepool got his day. He became the fifth player inducted into the Mets Hall of Fame, the fourteenth member overall. Now he was a world champion, a two-time pennant-winner and recognized by the only organization with which he’d ever been associated as immortal.

The Ed Kranepool story was, at last, complete.

***
Only kidding. The Ed Kranepool story was not complete. How could it be? His era is eternal, and the people who owned the Mets were who they were.

In the winter of 2017-18, despite Eddie’s many trips back to Shea Stadium and Citi Field for commemorative occasions, we learned Kranepool was sore at Jeff Wilpon. (Why should he have been any different from the rest of us?) An article, which ran in the New York Times, described Eddie on the outs with the entity that coronated him as a Hall of Famer. Not only that, but Eddie needed a kidney. He was selling much of his baseball memorabilia, not because he needed to, he said, but because it was time.

Amends were made in the summer of 2018, with the then-COO of the Mets reaching out and bringing back Eddie for a first pitch. Of greater import, the Krane got word in the spring of 2019 that a kidney donor with a match for his needs had been found. He was in greatly improved health and spirits by late June, when the 50th anniversary of the 1969 Mets was being toasted by a full house at Citi Field. Tom Seaver couldn’t be there because dementia had sidelined him from public appearances. Too many teammates were no longer with us, but whoever could be there came. Still, without Tom, somebody would have to speak for the group after they were all introduced. That was Seaver’s role at the 40th anniversary. It was always Seaver’s role.

Who better to speak for the 1969 Mets?

At the 50th, it was Kranepool’s. Of course it was. Steadiest Eddie was always around. That was worth more than WAR. The most memorable snippet of his brief speech was an admonition to the 2019 team to not give up despite being buried in the standings. “They can do it like we did,” he said to great cheers. The modern Mets eventually listened and inserted themselves into a playoff race you would have thought they’d have needed to pay admission to see.

I’d pay admission to attend a reunion of 1979 Mets. Or 1966 Mets. Or any Mets. With Steve Cohen taking over, anything is possible. That Ed Kranepool would be eligible to speak at eighteen of them would make the proposition only more attractive. Nobody ever earned the title A Met for ALL Seasons as much as he did from 1962 through 1979. Before 1980, you couldn’t imagine a season without Kranepool. The slice of 1970 he’d spent at Tidewater was surreal enough.

In Spring Training of ’79, prior to his 18th season, the player to be named later from the Jerry Koosman deal, a minor league reliever named Jesse Orosco, impressed enough to make the ballclub. Or maybe Orosco was chosen a couple of weeks shy of his 22nd birthday because the Mets could pay him the minimum (they’d cut Nelson Briles in camp so they wouldn’t have to pay him a veteran’s salary despite Briles taking part in the Chico Escuela bit). As every baseball fan knows, Jesse Orosco would do so much sticking around in the major leagues that the Mets would be able to trade for him a second time, a dozen years after trading him away, more than twenty years after trading for him the first time, fourteen days before the turn of the next millennium. The Mets wouldn’t hold onto him when they did — they’d trade Orosco for Joe McEwing in Spring Training of 2000 — but that’s some serious sticking around. Jesse was still pitching in 2003, when Jose Reyes was a rookie. You’d figure Kranepool would feel a bond with Orosco based on longevity alone.

Of course the Koosman-Orosco connection is a staple of all Mets historical discussion. The happy kind, anyway. Two pitchers have been on the mound for the last out certifying the Mets world champions, and they were traded for each other: Koosman from 1969 for Orosco from 1986. Not that we knew the back half of that equation in 1979. Yet in 2012, at the Hofstra Mets 50th anniversary conference, I heard Ed Kranepool, in the midst of excoriating the Mets for too swiftly disassembling the 1969 club, rail against the Jerry Koosman trade, even dismissing the Orosco portion of the transaction and the eventual great news that came from it when a friend of mine brought it up to him.

“I don’t care about any Jerry Orosco,” Kranepool fumed.

I’m sure he knew the pitcher’s name was Jesse, but as they said in Animal House, forget it, he’s rolling. And besides, he’s Ed Kranepool. He was being loyal to Jerry Koosman; to 1969; to the Mets he knew best, the Mets with whom he most closely identified, the Mets for whom he’d stand and speak in 2019. Koosman for Orosco turned out to be not a stone steal for the Mets the way we wish all our trades to be (Kooz pitched seven seasons after leaving the Mets and won twenty games as a 37-year-old as soon as he did), but you can’t say it wasn’t a plus trade for the Mets. Orosco grew into an All-Star closer. It was not incidental that he was on the mound for that second world championship. And he did pitch several seasons into the next century.

And we tip our cap right back to ya, Ed.

Yet at that moment in 2012, when Eddie was hopping mad all over again that the Mets had traded away his last friend from 1969, leaving him to carry the banner into miserable 1979 all by himself, a fan who’d predated 1986 could feel himself empathizing with the Krane. Yeah, how could they do that to you, Eddie?

Eight years later, that same fan would saddle Kranepool with carrying the 1979 banner, but forget it, I’m rolling.

Ed Kranepool became a Met in 1962. Seventeen years later, he was still a Met. It was miserable 1979. I became a Mets fan in 1969. Seventeen years later, I was still a Mets fan. It was glorious 1986. Meaning? I dunno. Stick at something long enough and you’ll be punished or rewarded, perhaps. But it doesn’t matter that in my eighteenth year of Mets fandom, I received the gaudiest, most overpowering and dominant season of Mets baseball ever, and that in Ed’s eighteenth year of playing for the Mets, he was part of the most depressing, least encouraging season of Mets baseball ever. It wasn’t like either one of us was going to do or be something different.

I’m certain I’m more sentimental about it than he is, but we’re both as loyal as can be to our Mets.

Michigan J. Team

Sunny Sunday, slight chill, right field corner, Citi Field. It’s September with a lead over our more or less blood rival in the Wild Card race, and I’m just waiting for the Mets to do something. Do something, do anything? No, I’m being vaguely specific in my desires. I’m waiting for the Mets to do that thing they do. In polite company, I’m cheering a little here and groaning a little there. In my head, I’m practically screaming at them to be what they’ve been for nine consecutive games dating back to Resurrection Thursday in Arizona. Make with the timely hitting and the clutch relieving and then wave the OMG sign around once you win your tenth in a row, because I’ve heard yours is a ballclub that never loses. C’mon, be the Mets I’ve been watching on TV, except do it in front of me!

The Mets, alas, turned into Michigan J. Frog as soon as I got close to them. No singing. No dancing. Not nearly enough hitting, save for one measly inning. Plenty of pitching, except at the end, when we really could have used more. All in all, it was just…ribet.

Goodbye, ma baby
Goodbye, ma honey
Goodbye, ma ragtime gal

For one day, anyway.

If I had told you in late May that we’d get to September, and a 3-1 loss to the Reds would land like a fastball to the ribs because it allowed the Braves to drift back into a tie with us for the final playoff spot, you’d likely think (after insisting I submit to a breathalyzer test) that the season had turned around dramatically since bottoming out so thuddingly. You’d be absolutely right and probably plenty pleased. Except we never fast-forward to the present and this isn’t quite the right time for “if I had told you” hosannas. We live in a present every day en route to the current present and we adjust our relationship to the standings accordingly. The standings of late May said we were dead. The standings of late August suggested death’s doorstep was nigh. The standings at the dawn of the second week of September say we’re dead even with the presumed invincible Braves. The moving of mountains and traversing of oceans to get here has constituted an epic journey, yet it is immaterial to our mood the morning after our first loss in a week-and-a-half.

We know we were thisclose to staying a game, maybe moving two games ahead of Atlanta. Except we lost in the ninth to the Reds, and the Braves beat the Blue Jays in eleven. It’s the time of the season when every opportunity is golden, and we just witnessed a pair sail agonizingly slightly to the wrong side of a surprisingly short foul pole. Thus I groaned a little louder than I cheered on Sunday. Mostly I thought, from a dark place the sun didn’t reach, COME ON ALREADY, YOU STUPID TEAM!

Oh, you’re not stupid. I’m sorry for screaming, albeit in my head. If it were a September Sunday without significant stakes, what a lovely September Sunday it would have been simply for baseball’s sake. The sun, the chill, my old pal Ken with whom I’d somehow never seen a game live and in person until this one. Ken activated a lovely Ken-nection and got us seated in that right field corner, where we watched Luis Severino do all he could do for six-and-two-thirds innings of one-run ball — with acrobatic infield defense playing its usual essential role — but otherwise breathed in the frustration of the Mets not stringing together hits for the sake of a run more than once. In the bottom of the sixth, when it had been nothing-nothing all afternoon, a facsimile of a rally occurred: a one-out walk; a two-out infield hit; then Starling Marte lining a single into center to bring home Pete Alonso. There — 1-0. Surely the floodgates were open.

That next sound you heard was the floodgates being fastened. The Mets, a little less deep without the services of Jeff McNeil, scored no more. Not even Francisco Lindor could get on base. Severino, whose only blemish erupted on a dying quail of an RBI single on his last pitch, was succeeded by Reed Garrett, who prevented further Cincinnati trips to home plate as he closed out the seventh. Garrett locked down the eighth as well, but then Phil Maton cracked. Phil Maton had done almost nothing wrong since relocating to the Met bullpen from Tampa Bay’s right before the All-Star break. Yet like the Mets losing at last after winning so much, Maton grew fallible all at once.

He hits a guy. He gives up a grounder that required so much effort on the corralling that nobody could be thrown out anywhere. He allows a double that there’s no need to examine more closely on a day when video replay was called into action repeatedly. It’s clearly a no-doubt double that scores the two decisive ninth-inning runs that are about to seal our Sunday fate. You want to believe the Mets can come up in the bottom of the ninth and pull off in miniature what they’ve been pulling off writ large for more than three months, but then you see them mostly flailing at Alexis Diaz, not exactly the Reds’ answer to his brother Edwin, but close enough. “I’m six-three, I throw ninety-seven miles per hour, and there’s two of me.” The wrong Diaz got the save.

What a friend recently convinced me had been the Tom Seaver Redemption Tour, wherein we sweep every team The Franchise never should have been loaned out to, came up a veritable Jimmy Qualls shy of perfection. Three out of three from the White Sox. Three out of three from the Red Sox. Two out of three from the Reds. Next for us are the Blue Jays, the team that signed Dennis Lamp in January 1984, enabling the White Sox to choose a player from the short-lived, ill-conceived compensation pool where Tom was left to float while Frank Cashen abandoned his lifeguard chair for five minutes. On Sunday, we rooted against the Reds in our game and for the Blue Jays in the Braves’ game, with neither result working out to our satisfaction. Tonight, we root against the Blue Jays in our game and for the Reds in the Braves’ game. It’s September, you’re either with us or against us or both.

We as fans are always with us, even when we’re silently screaming at us.

Look Who's No. 6

LOOK WHO’S NO. 6

OK, maybe that message isn’t inspiring enough to make a September scoreboard in Queens, but it’s true: At this writing the Mets are a game ahead of the Braves for the third National League wild card, which is a fancy way of saying sixth in a league that now grants playoff spots to its top six teams. Moreover, they’re just a half-game behind the Diamondbacks for the second wild card (less fancy: fifth) and two games behind the Padres for the first wild card, AKA fourth.

Nine-game winning streaks will do a lot.

Saturday’s game against the Reds was one of those contests that might not be particularly interesting in the details but still says a fair amount about the mindset of team and fans. The Mets couldn’t scratch against Jakob Junis, who’d apparently gotten a deal on sliders at Costco; they hit ball after ball that looked mildly interesting off the bat but settled into an outfielder’s glove. They didn’t have a base runner until Mark Vientos walked in the fourth and lacked a hit until Jose Iglesias doubled in the fifth, all Junis gave up in five innings of work.

Meanwhile, Jose Quintana was mixing up his pitches and hitting his spots in his bid for a 100th career win, and he was helped out by some remarkable defense, with Iglesias starting a 4-6-3 double play to erase a leadoff walk in the second and Francisco Lindor initiating a twin killing in the third. The first of those looked like a magic trick: Iglesias smothered a Ty France grounder moving to his left, pivoting on his knees to wind up in perfect throwing position, and then Lindor caught his feed low and to the outfield side of second, continuing his motion to throw to Pete Alonso for the second out. The second was nearly as good, with Lindor snagging a Jonathan India grounder to deep short on the backhand and somehow pivoting smoothly to hit Iglesias at second, with his double-play partner wasting not so much as a nanosecond on the pivot to nip India on the back end.

Both plays started with a combination of perfect instincts and muscle memory — Iglesias rolling just so to be able to hit Lindor at second, Lindor converting his momentum heading into the hole into the energy needed to throw — and were completed thanks to economy of motion against a pitilessly ticking clock. The Mets will miss Jeff McNeil‘s versatility, and I’ll miss McNeil’s perpetual outrage at the slightest misfortune, but those two plays were reassurance that the Mets should be just fine up the middle.

With Junis excused further duty, the Mets wasted no time against Sam Moll: Harrison Bader broke a oil-well-deep slump with a solo homer, followed by a walk from Lindor (extending his on-base streak to 35, which is a new single-season Mets record, though his hitting streak was stopped at 16) and a Brandon Nimmo HBP. Exit Moll and enter Carson Spiers, who I perhaps once knew is long-ago Met Bill Spiers‘ nephew. Spiers the Younger was greeted rudely, with RBI singles by Alonso and a two-run double from J.D. Martinez.

That was the ballgame, pretty much: Adam Ottavino got the last out of the seventh, Danny Young turned in a spotless eighth and Edwin Diaz wobbled a bit but found himself to secure the ninth. Being sixth-best never felt so good.

When Plan B Turns Out A-OK

The Mets’ ebullient recent narrative showed a couple of cracks Friday night against the Reds.

Francisco Lindor continued his hitting streak and made a nifty play at shortstop, but he didn’t walk off the Reds or solve the Middle East conflict in an idle moment between innings, somewhere between surprising and shocking given how he’s been playing. In the bottom of the ninth, with Tyrone Taylor on first and one out, Lindor popped out on the first pitch he saw against Alexis Diaz (appearing opposite his brother for the first time in a big-league game), and it somehow felt mildly sitcommy, like seeing the protagonist slip and fall off a gantry two strides before disarming the armed nuclear device at the heart of the villain’s secret lair.

Similarly, Sean Manaea was good but not quite his dominating self of late, missing just a tad on the edges and corners. Manaea only made two truly regrettable pitches all night, but the first became a two-run homer for Elly De La Cruz and the second became a two-run homer for TJ Friedl. Both tied the game; the latter pushed Manaea to a slightly earlier than expected exit in the seventh.

But these are pinch-yourself times for the Mets — they haven’t been behind on the scoreboard since Game 1 against the White Sox a week ago, and that deficit lasted a couple of eye blinks. So after Manaea wasn’t quite indomitable, Reed Garrett stepped in to retire four batters, Edwin Diaz struck out the side in the ninth and Jose Butto shrugged off the Manfred Man to work a 1-2-3 10th.

Mark Vientos started the scoring in the first with a sizzling two-run homer off opener Fernando Cruz; the Mets regained the lead following De La Cruz’s homer thanks to an odd sequence in the sixth. With two outs, Pete Alonso hit a drive down the right-field line that spent a considerable amount of time in Jake Fraley‘s glove, only to come free after Fraley tumbled to the ground. Looked odd but that’s the rule; Jose Iglesias followed Alonso with a sharp single to left, with Alonso beating a not particularly good throw from Spencer Steer, and then Iglesias came home on a single by J.D. Martinez. Destiny stuff, until Friedl barged into the story with a twist of his own and made all that supplementary material.

One thing that is fairly predictable in post-modern baseball, however: The team that fails to convert its Manfred Man in the top of the 10th is up against it in the bottom of the 10th. With Brandon Nimmo handed second via let’s-get-this-over-with rulebook largesse, Vientos’ job was to advance him to third so that Alonso could hit a walkoff homer or a drive over the no-deeper-than-they-can-throw outfielders or a clean single or a ground ball with eyes or pretty much anything. Not a guarantee, not with the Polar Bear’s heartbeat accelerating to unwise tempos in RBI situations, but time-honored.

Vientos, of course, entered the season looking like he’d been nudged out of the prospect column and into the suspect one, sent to Syracuse after Brett Baty was given third base and Martinez arrived to designate-hit hit designatedly DH. Instead it’s Baty whose scouting report has turned into the stuff of sighs and shrugs: Given another chance, Vientos has mashed at the plate and looked surprisingly adequate bordering on actually just fine in the field.

The 10th-inning AB was a tidy little made-for-video showcase of his growth: Vientos went to work against old friend Justin Wilson, looking cool and controlled in fighting off alternating cutters and four-seamers. Wilson’s eighth pitch was better than most of the ones that had preceded it, on the inside corner and designed to yield a swing and a miss or be pulled to the left side, ahead of Nimmo’s station.

And the latter did, in fact, happen — except Vientos pulled Wilson’s pitch 401 feet into the seats for a walkoff win capped by a joyous home-plate scrum, baths of Grimace-colored Gatorade, and curious Mets fans Googling tattooed Hebrew. (“Be anxious for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God.”)

Request heard and answered — and in discussing his turnaround, Vientos did indeed thank his celestial skipper. Asked about magic, our drenched protagonist replied, “I don’t know if I believe in magic, but we have the energy and the right mindset going into this month because we’re hungry. September is the right time to get hot.”

No lie detected, as the kids possibly still say. Magic is an excellent tactic to deploy, should it be available to you; failing that, energy and the right mindset make for a pretty good Plan B.

And We’re Talking Mets in Levittown

An ideal off day for Mets fans includes each of the three teams slightly ahead of our team in the Wild Card standings losing. Take what happened Thursday: the Padres lost; the Diamondbacks lost; the Braves lost. That last one is especially delicious, as it dropped Atlanta into a tie with us for the last playoff spot, so now we’ve got only two teams slightly ahead of us.

Next time the Mets are scheduled to be off will be this coming Thursday, September 12. None of the National League Wild Card contenders will be playing, so, naturally, you’re wondering how you’re going to fill the void in your life.

Fortunately, I have a suggestion.

Should you be in the general vicinity of Levittown on Long Island at 3:30 PM, you are cordially invited to the Levittown Public Library to a program the folks there titled Mets Talk With Greg Prince. It will be a chat about rooting, writing and reading baseball, and you won’t have to hear just me talk. Joining me to add some excellent albeit non-Met insights on the subject(s) will be my friend and fellow Long Islander Gary Mintz. Gary recently published a most charming memoir called Baseball From 3,000 Miles Away about devoting his life to being a San Francisco Giants fan on the most inconvenient of American coasts for that sort of thing. I’ve gotten to know Gary through our shared affection for the legacy of our dear, departed New York Giants, a history that comes alive just about every week through the Zoom sessions Gary organizes as president of the New York Giants Preservation Society.

I root for the National League team that came to be in New York. He pulls for the team that stayed the Giants. Between us, we have this continent covered.

We’ll each get into our love of the game, our passions for our respective ballclubs, and why baseball is such a good fit for the printed/pixelated page. It may not be as stirring as an actual ballgame with postseason stakes, but I believe you’ll come away from it deciding it was better than nothing.

Levittown Public Library is located at 1 Bluegrass Lane, a bit south of Hempstead Turnpike. More information on the program is here. Hope to see you Thursday.

Two Mounds, One Hill

After giving injury rehab his best shot among a flock of Toronto Blue Jay minor leaguers, native Ontarian and lifelong Cincinnati Red Joey Votto announced his retirement on August 22. Johnny Cueto, who made his season debut one day earlier for the Angels, pitched exactly once more in L.A. of A garb. The Halos considered his 7.15 ERA and DFA’d him on August 30; one is tempted to say “serves him right” for his participation as a Kansas City Royal in the 2015 World Series, but we’ll try to let that go. Three-time Cy Young Award winner Max Scherzer began the year on the injured list; he made eight starts for Texas between late June and the end of July before shoulder fatigue returned him to the IL. Three-time Cy Young Award winner Clayton Kershaw’s recent trajectory eerily mirrored Scherzer’s: seven starts spanning late July to the end of August, with a toe issue compelling the Dodgers to sideline him. David Robertson’s campaign has gone uninterrupted, allowing him to make 54 healthy appearances, but there’s one place he hasn’t appeared, as his Rangers have followed a road schedule that didn’t direct them to Queens.

Two surefire Hall of Famers in Scherzer and Kershaw. One with very good Cooperstown odds in Votto. Two others in Cueto and Robertson whose careers can be described without dispute as distinguished. Five players spanning ages 36 to 40 who spent as much of 2024 as possible being what they’d always been since they stopped going to school — professional ballplayers. How long have or had Votto, Cueto, Scherzer, Kershaw, and Robertson been around? Long enough so that each man’s Career Splits page on Baseball-Reference includes a line reflecting what he did at a ballpark that ceased operations on September 28, 2008.

Yet only one man in this season can say he played a game there way back when and played a game next door right here in a present that’s as current as can be as we speak. Yet it was none of the above who pulled off the twin-thrilling. Not until Wednesday night, September 4, did a real, live Shea Stadium veteran cross into fair territory at Citi Field and spring into 2024 action. No spring chicken he, perhaps, but when it comes to major league longevity, he’s both cock of the walk and king of the hill.

Make that Hill. Rich Hill. Rich Hill of the Boston Red Sox, as he has been frequently in a big league journey that began nineteen summers ago and now encompasses eight discrete signings with the Sawx. The eighth came following what could have been interpreted as his final season, 2023, when he was a Pirate and a Padre. At the stage when this Met season was young and hopeless, Jason sent me a list of the five active players he knew of who could claim Shea experience, wondering if there was anybody he’d missed. I e-nodded back that I didn’t know of any others who met the criteria of being under contract to somebody at that instant, but later thought to do a quick search to see how Rich Hill was spending his days.

Hill wasn’t pitching anywhere when 2024 began, but he wasn’t exactly not pitching. The New Englander had let it be known he preferred to spend the spring watching his son play Little League. Then, should the opportunity arise, he’d listen more closely to the offers he was still getting. Rich Hill may have turned 44 in March, but he had a left arm that threw curves capable of getting batters out on occasion. Of course he heard offers.

The Red Sox made another in August, and there he was, tuning up for Triple-A Worcester after signing his eighth contract with the Boston organization. Soon enough, he was in a Boston uniform, and Boston’s road schedule just happened to direct the Red Sox to Queens. The stakes weren’t as high as the first time the Red Sox visited the Mets for games that counted (Rich was 6 in 1986), but they mattered to both teams. The Sox are barely hanging on in the American League Wild Card race; the Mets are pounding at the door of being one of the leaders of the NL’s.

Only the Mets had been playing like a team that planned to turn September into October, having won six in a row before jumping out to a 4-0 lead in the first on Wednesday in the clubs’ series finale. Jumping? More like slamming, once Jesse Winker stepped up with the bases loaded and got hold of a Tanner Houck delivery, transporting it just high enough above the left field fence so it could it be of optimal use to the home team. We’d already taken the first two from Boston, and we were well ahead from the get-go in this one, so unless something went terribly wrong, a Mets fan with Shea on the brain simply had to sit back and look forward to a possible Rich Hill appearance at Citi.

Did I mention Tylor Megill was pitching for the Mets? Yeah, probably should have noted that. Megill enabled the Red Sox to creep to within 4-3 while Houck shut down the Mets after Winker’s slam. Who knew games in September aren’t always a breeze? Interest in linking Shea and Citi had to take a back seat to more vital matters. Megill departed in the fifth. The relievers of most relevance were any Mets who could throw double play ground balls. As it happened, we had three of them. Alex Young in the fifth, Huascar Brazoban in the sixth, and Danny Young in the seventh each escaped a jam by coordinating with his infielders on lead-preserving GIDPs.

Three different pitchers. Three different innings. Three double play grounders. Somebody disseminated the info that that had happened once before in Mets history. At Shea, of course. I say “of course” out of affection for Shea as the kind of place where all the fun things happened. Like 1986. Like 1969. Like the trio of happy ground balls that were elicited on August 7, 1966, in the first game of a Banner Day (fun!) doubleheader versus the St. Louis Cardinals. The pitchers who disentangled then were Gerry Arrigo in the fifth, Larry Bearnarth — in his final Met appearance — in the sixth, and Darrell Sutherland in the seventh. Maybe because the game was a Met loss in a season when the Mets finished ninth, the names Arrigo, Bearnarth, and Sutherland haven’t carried any extra resonance from their combined feat over the past 58 years. Or maybe people weren’t quite so impressed by randomness in 1966. Yet should September 4, 2024, become recognized as one more essential step on a championship trail, let’s not forget how two fellows named Young bracketed a Huascar named Brazelbon to keep a 4-3 game 4-3.

When he was Montreal’s pitching coach, Larry Bearnarth would regularly get play from Bob Murphy in that way Murph would talk about Mets who’d been around from almost the beginning. That’s how I learned good ol’ Larry Bearnarth, a Met from 1963 to 1966, was a standout at St. John’s. What a wonderful guy. In my mind, Larry Bearnarth’s Met Equity measures at least a 5 out of 10. If Bob Murphy could sound delighted well after the fact about somebody who went 13-21 across four second-division seasons, he must have been important. Using that same scale — 1 to 10, with your Ed Kranepools and Mookie Wilsons at 10 and whatever reliever we released after no more than two innings in July a 1 — I’d slot Rich Hill’s Met Equity at about a 3.

That’s right: Rich Hill was a Met. Almost a half-season in 2021. Came to the Mets for the same reason he came back to the Red Sox, to help along a team with postseason aspirations. It didn’t work that well for Hill and the Mets, either. Amiable gentleman as far as I could tell. Tried his hardest throwing his softest. I don’t doubt Bob Murphy would have said nice things on his behalf. But there was a here-and-gone quality to Hill, just as there was a here-and-gone quality to the 2021 Mets as a whole. Though it’s stayed with me, his status as likely the last pitcher to ever lay down a sacrifice bunt at home have probably endured in the collective consciousness as long as the ground ball-getting exploits of Messrs. Arrigo, Bearnarth, and Sutherland.

Yet in the eighth inning on September 4, 2024, I was overjoyed to see Rich Hill take the mound at Citi Field. I was already joyed, if you will. That 4-3 lead that had been protected so carefully by so many Met bullpen arms (including Phil Maton’s), was now growing. The Red Sox had developed a new strategy to avoid home run balls like the one Winker sent for a ride. They apparently took that “cock of the walk” stuff to heart and decided to walk everybody. No complaints here. A walk, a single, and a walk loaded the bases with one out. Another walk pushed in a run to make it 5-3, Mets. It also pushed Alex Cora out of the third base dugout to remove Kenley Jansen and bring in Hill.

Here came living history! Here came somebody who played at Shea Stadium! Rich Hill pitched for the Cubs on August 5, 2005. Started and didn’t make it out of the second. It was so long ago that he was succeeded to the mound by Glendon Rusch, who pitched for the 1999 Mets. His right fielder was Jeromy Burnitz of the 1993 Mets. On TV that night, I distinctly remember Ralph Kiner comparing Cub first baseman Derrek Lee to 1941 Brooklyn Dodger phenomenon Pete Reiser before Fran Healy interrupted him. Pete Reiser! My mother would talk about Pete Reiser like Bob Murphy would talk about Larry Bearnarth. Shut up, Fran, I thought, just as I’d been thinking since first getting cable in 1985.

All of that happened around Rich Hill at Shea Stadium in 2005, the same Rich Hill who entered the game at Citi Field on Wednesday night in 2024. When was the last time you heard anybody bring up Pete Reiser? Or Fran Healy?

Hill had one more Shea outing, May 16, 2007. The game, which I also distinctly remember, started three hours late because of rain (can’t blame everything on Healy). Jose Reyes was dealing with a tight hamstring, which we believed was the worst thing that could happen to the Mets at the time. Reyes proved OK…and we learned much worse things could happen to the Mets in 2007.

Places where Rich Hill has been known to spend the night, still.

Distant, tangible memories of a ballpark I’ll never forget. They had nothing to do with Rich Hill at the moment they were generated, but Hill has survived in uniform to embody them. Pending what becomes of the handful of active players who stopped by in 2008 as youngsters, Rich looms as the last player to play at Shea Stadium to play at Citi Field. I wouldn’t put it past any among Scherzer, Robertson, or Kershaw to find his way to Flushing next year, but I also wouldn’t doubt Hill getting another contract or eight from the Red Sox. Pete Rose played against the Mets at the Polo Grounds in 1963 and against the Mets at Shea Stadium in 1986. An ageless left arm could take a pitcher clear to 2031 if handled with care.

The Mets, delighting me as much as Hill’s mere presence at Citi Field did, handled their venerable opponent with care, which is to say they stood by and let him do what was being done before he came in. He walked Jeff McNeil with the bases loaded. He walked Francisco Alvarez with the bases loaded. Slumping Harrison Bader, who could have really used a base hit, made sufficient contact for a sacrifice fly. Rich Hill exited with the score Mets 8 Red Sox 3, soon to go final.

“Shea Stadium lives” is the tempting conclusion to our Rich Hill interaction, but Shea Stadium has been alive in our hearts this whole time. Of more concern now that Hill and the Red Sox have moved on is that the team that plays 81 games a year at Citi Field couldn’t be more alive or well. The 2024 Mets have now won seven in a row. The third Wild Card remains a Brave hiccup away. The record for consecutive Met victories is eleven, established in 1969 and matched four times since. No eleven-game winning streak in Mets history has occurred in a season’s second half, but being hot in September is not without precedent. The 1969 Mets won ten in a row, then another nine in a row.

“1969 Mets comparisons don’t seem altogether inappropriate” is therefore today’s coda of choice. It has the benefit of being true.

Our Time in Eden

These days…

I’m tempted to offer no notes on what feels, now that it’s been put in the books, like a perfect win. The Mets never trailed. When the score grew close, the Mets added on eventually. When the score grew close again, the Mets prevented it from becoming even — then added on immediately. The starting pitching was spectacular. The relief pitching was effective. The offense picked its spots to be timely. The defense made every play it had to.

You might feel a shaft of light make its way across your face…

Except one, maybe. So I do have a note.

And when you do, you’ll know how it was meant to be…

It’s the eighth inning Tuesday night at Citi Field. The Mets are leading the Red Sox, 3-1. Whatever’s gone swimmingly to this point needs to go another couple of laps. Mark Vientos’s homer in the seventh provided breathing room. Deep breaths are in order, nonetheless. Jose Butto, he of the nine pitches for three quick outs the frame before, dips into trouble. Two walks to the Sox. One walk to the phone with an urgent message: “Reed Garrett, please report to the pitcher’s mound.”

See the signs and know their meaning…

Reed Garrett can worry you. Every reliever can worry you. Every starter has worried us at some point in 2024. There was a time David Peterson didn’t seem like a sure thing. He’s sure reliable now. Six innings, one run, eleven strikeouts, very little trouble. Butto, as mentioned, was wonderful in the seventh, not so much in the eighth. Garrett wasn’t touched at all over the weekend when he last worked, but those were other Sox. The Red ones are capable of unspooling a good night’s work. The Red ones have Rafael Devers coming to the plate with runners on first and second and nobody out.

It’s true…

Devers grounds a ball toward short. No tailor has been involved in its production. If it’s going to turn into a much-needed double play, the stitching will have to be handled in ad hoc fashion. The shortstop is Francisco Lindor. Who else is it going to be? Francisco Lindor took his position on Opening Day and has yet to have left it. Francisco Lindor makes so many plays, it is reasonable to assume he will make all of them, including a double play on a slow grounder that is by no means tailor-made for DP purposes.

You’ll know how it was meant to be…

Lindor hesitates in the simultaneous act of deciding and fielding just enough to let you know a) the Mets aren’t going to get the runner at second via Lindor’s toss; b) the Mets aren’t going to get the runner at first on the ensuing relay; c) the bases are loaded and still nobody is out; and d) contrary to emerging conventional wisdom, Francisco perhaps can do it all but doesn’t always manage to do everything every time.

Hear the signs and know they’re speaking to you…

Lindor coming up shy of constituting a one-man team is all right, however, because the man does have teammates, and they are pretty helpful to his, their and our cause. Garrett gets the next Red Sox batter, Emmanuel Valdez, to fly to medium-right. Another right fielder — like strong-armed Starling Marte, who’d just been taken out for defense — might have fired home to attempt to nail the lead runner. McNeil, who doesn’t play a ton of right, judged himself better served by getting the ball back into second. He couldn’t prevent the run that trimmed the Mets’ lead to 3-2, but he did keep a runner from advancing to third. A few pitches later, Garrett teased another ground ball. Not tailor-made, but Iglesias-assisted in meeting its double-play destiny: 4-6-3, with Lindor square in the middle of the rally-snuffing.

To you.

Clinging to a 3-2 lead in the top of the ninth loomed as the Mets’ job if they did not expand their edge in the bottom of the eighth. “OMG” may be the theme of the year, but “TCB” still has some utility in Flushing. The Mets’ offense took care of business ASAP. McNeil singled to where he’d just been standing and throwing in right. Francisco Alvarez, one of the Mets seemingly forever mired in a 3-for-30 slump (we have a couple in every lineup), also went to right field via a convenient hole in the infield. Who should be up next but Francisco Lindor? It was as predictable as finding him at short in the top of the inning. Lindor is up just about every time we need him and comes through practically regularly. That lead Peterson was able to protect? That was Lindor’s doing on a two-run homer in the third. Lindor’s always doing something. David Stearns, who doesn’t have to worry about inflating his value since his contract was signed and sealed long before he showed up to run baseball operations, suggested before the game that Lindor not only bears a striking resemblance to what an MVP looks like, he’s also quite possibly putting together the “greatest individual position player season” any Met has ever crafted. Talk about tailor-made foreshadowing.

Our team, our theme (one of them).

Lindor, whose impact on the Mets’ fortunes in 2024 is roughly equivalent to that of Kelly Leak’s on those of the Bad News Bears in 1976 (save for the second-hand smoke), doubles home McNeil with the insurance run to restore the Mets’ lead to two. Then Brandon Nimmo brings in Alvarez with a sac fly. And, in case you’ve forgotten we have a Polar Bear roaming the premises, Pete Alonso socks a ball out of sight to make the game both 7-2 and a foregone conclusion. Alonso’s home run was his 31st. Lindor’s home run earlier was his 30th. Mighty generous of Francisco to leave a category for some other Met to lead.

When Steve Gelbs co-hosted his nightly edition of The Francisco Lindor Show in the moments following the final out, the star of the game and just about every game allowed his praises to be sung out of courtesy to the fellow holding the microphone, but mostly he wanted to acknowledge he didn’t make that play on that ground ball in the eighth and that his teammates picked him up. That, I thought, is how you contend for Most Valuable Player honors in this league, by not settling for doing almost everything right — and almost always expressing the most valuable of sentiments.

The win was the Mets’ sixth in a row. They are eleven games over .500 for the first time this season and eleven games over .500 for the first time in any season in which they’d previously fallen eleven games under .500. I wouldn’t have given you a plug nickel for their chances to get as high as .500 when they were wallowing, thereby suggesting my predictive powers aren’t worth a plug penny. Nevertheless, I will allow this: I now have a feeling about this team I haven’t had all of 2024. They’re not yet in a playoff position, but I believe they will be. They most definitely haven’t clinched anything, but I believe they are bound to. There is no telling what might happen in the postseason, but I’m envisioning what I’m envisioning. To elaborate would be to predict, and we’ve already established my predictions are worthless.

But these are days when my feelings for this team are off the charts.